行政诉讼庭审中法官与当事人协同关系的构建
发布时间：2018-07-31 11:36
【摘要】：庭审是案件审理的关键环节,是法官与当事人探寻公正的重要场合。辩论主义和职权主义诉讼模式在各自发展过程中呈现出趋同融合的趋势,以此为基础产生了协同主义的庭审。协同主义将辩论主义与职权主义的优势因素相结合,注重法官与当事人关系的协同,对我国行政诉讼庭审程序的构建具有重要启示意义。我国当前行政诉讼庭审具有较强的当事人竞技,法官消极裁判的辩论主义特点。这种庭审所预设的理想功能虽有一定发挥,但在诉讼参与人与庭审的匹配程度、庭审的主要功能实现、裁判结果产生等方面存有运行偏离和不足。为此,应对当前行政诉讼庭审进行相关改良设计,构建法官与当事人协同关系,从而克服现存弊端。
[Abstract]:Trial is the key link of case trial and an important occasion for judges and parties to seek justice. In the process of their development, argumentalism and authority litigation have shown a trend of convergence and convergence, which has led to a synergetic trial. Synergy combines the advantages of argumentalism and power doctrine and pays attention to the relationship between judge and litigant. It is of great significance for the construction of trial procedure of administrative litigation in our country. At present, the trial of administrative litigation in our country has the characteristics of strong competition of the parties and the argumentalism of the judge's negative judgment. Although this kind of trial presupposes the ideal function has certain exertion, but in the lawsuit participant and the trial match degree, the trial main function realization, the judgment result production and so on aspect has the movement deviation and the insufficiency. Therefore, it is necessary to improve the current administrative litigation court and construct the synergetic relationship between the judge and the litigant, so as to overcome the existing drawbacks.
【作者单位】： 清华大学;
【分类号】：D925.3
[Abstract]:Trial is the key link of case trial and an important occasion for judges and parties to seek justice. In the process of their development, argumentalism and authority litigation have shown a trend of convergence and convergence, which has led to a synergetic trial. Synergy combines the advantages of argumentalism and power doctrine and pays attention to the relationship between judge and litigant. It is of great significance for the construction of trial procedure of administrative litigation in our country. At present, the trial of administrative litigation in our country has the characteristics of strong competition of the parties and the argumentalism of the judge's negative judgment. Although this kind of trial presupposes the ideal function has certain exertion, but in the lawsuit participant and the trial match degree, the trial main function realization, the judgment result production and so on aspect has the movement deviation and the insufficiency. Therefore, it is necessary to improve the current administrative litigation court and construct the synergetic relationship between the judge and the litigant, so as to overcome the existing drawbacks.
【作者单位】： 清华大学;
【分类号】：D925.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 罗尔夫·施蒂尔纳;周翠;;当事人主导与法官权限——辩论主义与效率冲突中的诉讼指标与实质阐明[J];清华法学;2011年02期
2 何帆;;言词辩论:大法官与律师的舞台[J];司法;2009年00期
3 应松年,薛刚凌;行政诉讼十年回顾——行政诉讼的成就、价值、问题与完善[J];行政法学研究;1999年04期
4 张卫平;我国民事诉讼辩论原则重述[J];法学研究;1996年06期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 亢晶晶;;民事释明权理论在刑事诉讼中的导入——以“审判中心主义”为视角[J];甘肃政法学院学报;2017年04期
2 冯玉;;行政诉讼庭审中法官与当事人协同关系的构建[J];理论探索;2017年04期
3 刘晶;;论民事诉讼中的辩论原则[J];法制与社会;2017年18期
4 许尚豪;康健;;跨国民事诉讼中临时性救济问题研究——兼论“一带一路”视角下临时性救济制度的构建[J];理论探索;2017年03期
5 汤先;;德国法官实质指挥对我国诉讼权限分配的借鉴[J];法制博览;2017年07期
6 牛r，
本文编号：2155463
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2155463.html
