执行异议之诉：实务中的问题与对策

发布时间：2018-08-03 22:02

【摘要】：2007年《民事诉讼法》引入了执行异议之诉制度,改变了长期以来仅关注执行效率,而忽略案外人合法权益的做法,给与了案外人以诉权保障,体现了立法从维护债权人利益到保障案外人合法权益的态度转变。但时至今日,对于执行异议之诉在司法实践中的具体操作,法律和司法解释仍没有系统、统一的规范,立法上的阙如造成实务中的混乱,在诉讼标的、裁判范围、认定标准等问题上,法律还未能起到定纷止争的效果。本文选取实务中的案例,拟就实务中的热点问题、裁判中亟须统一的争议点展开讨论,期能抛砖引玉,为审判实践提供参考。本文第一章重点讨论了执行异议之诉诉讼标的的认定。首先对实务中的不同做法进行梳理；其次,从案例、司法裁判和理论的角度分析各种不同的观点；最后,从执行异议之诉的目的、司法裁判和既判力的角度进行分析,并在此基础上,提出合理界定异议之诉诉讼标的的建议。本文第二章主要讨论了执行异议之诉中对合同的裁判。本章论述主要围绕两个问题,首先,执行异议之诉中,对于合同问题,法院该不该审、该不该判：其次,对执行异议之诉中常见的几类合同效力情况进行分析。本文第三章主要讨论执行异议之诉中案外人资格的认定。首先,明确认定方法及步骤；其次,对案外人是否享有实体权属进行讨论：最后,将“足以排除强制执行的民事权益”这一抽象概念具体化,讨论实务中常见的案外人所享有的权益是否“足以排除强制执行”。
[Abstract]:In 2007, the Civil procedure Law introduced the action system of executive dissent, which changed the practice of only paying attention to the efficiency of execution for a long time, while ignoring the legitimate rights and interests of the outsider in the case, so as to guarantee the right of action to the outsider in the case. It reflects the change of legislation from protecting the interests of creditors to protecting the legitimate rights and interests of outsiders in the case. Today, however, there is still no system of legal and judicial interpretation for the specific operation of the enforcement of dissent in judicial practice. The lack of legislation results in confusion in practice, in the subject of litigation, and in the scope of adjudication. On issues such as standards, the law has not yet been able to settle disputes. This article selects the case in the practice, intends to discuss the hot issues in practice, the adjudication urgently needs the unified dispute point, the period can throw the brick to lead the jade, provides the reference for the trial practice. The first chapter focuses on the determination of the object of action. First of all, to sort out the different practices in practice; secondly, to analyze different viewpoints from the perspective of cases, judicial decisions and theories; finally, to analyze the purpose of the enforcement of dissent complaints, judicial decisions and res judicata. And on this basis, put forward a reasonable definition of the object of dissent action. The second chapter mainly discusses the judgment of the contract in the action of executive dissent. This chapter mainly focuses on two issues, first, the execution of dissent in the litigation, for the contract, the court should not be adjudicated, should not decide; secondly, the execution of dissent in the common cases of several types of contract effectiveness analysis. The third chapter mainly discusses the qualification of the outsider in the action of dissent of execution. First of all, it is clear to identify the methods and steps; secondly, to discuss whether the outsiders in the case enjoy substantive ownership: finally, to concretize the abstract concept of "sufficient to exclude the enforcement of civil rights and interests". Discuss whether the interests enjoyed by outsiders in practice are "sufficient to exclude enforcement".
【学位授予单位】：东南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】