我国行政诉讼检察监督制度存在的问题及完善
发布时间：2018-08-04 09:10
【摘要】：行政诉讼制度将传统观念中高高在上的权力平放到公众的权利面前，对于我国法治发展和法治建设具有里程碑式的意义。但是，在实践运行中，行政诉讼的立法目的并没有充分实现，因此需要建立一种合理的、行之有效的监督方式来监督行政权力的运行和法院的审理活动，进而确保行政诉讼顺利进行。在这种背景下，行政诉讼检察监督制度应运而生。行政诉讼检察监督有助于行政诉讼的提起、有助于规范行政诉讼活动、有助于促进行政工作法治化进程、有助于公民法治意识的形成。并且在推进依法治国、保障人权，，推动我国社会主义市场经济建设方面发挥了重要作用。这项制度不仅符合我国发展社会主义市场经济的需要，也符合我国构建和谐社会的需求。 但是，伴随着民主化进程的推进和民众价值选择的多样，对于行政诉讼检察监督制度的评判的价值评判标准也多元起来。社会转型期的阵痛深刻的影响到了这项制度的构建，也使得制度本身的缺陷和不足扩大起来，进而限制了该制度的运作效果，更使得公众对这一制度变得怀疑与不信任。因此在肯定该制度的价值与正当性的前提下，更应该正视问题的存在，进而提出对策完善相关制度，这对于增强检察监督的效果获取公众认同，有着理论与实际的双重价值。另外，需要强调的是，笔者所主张的是能够促进经济与社会平稳发展的改革，如果因为法制化与民主化进程推进太快，而导致的经济发展停滞甚至倒退或者是造成社会混乱也是不允许的。 笔者通过分析行政诉讼检察监督制度的内涵进而引出了对该制度的必要性及作用的探讨，分析了我国现行行政诉讼检察监督制度中存在的问题，支持行政诉讼检察监督制度应继续存在并且应当进一步加强的主张，提出通过完善立法的方式，拓宽行政诉讼检察监督范围、增加行政诉讼检察监督的方式等手段来完善我国行政诉讼检察监督制度。
[Abstract]:The administrative litigation system puts the high power in the traditional concept in front of the public rights, which is of milestone significance to the development and construction of the rule of law in our country. However, in practice, the legislative purpose of administrative litigation has not been fully realized. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a reasonable and effective way of supervision to supervise the operation of administrative power and the trial activities of the courts. And then ensure the smooth progress of administrative proceedings. Under this background, the administrative litigation procuratorial supervision system arises at the historic moment. The procuratorial supervision of administrative litigation is helpful to the institution of administrative proceedings, to standardizing administrative litigation activities, to promoting the process of the rule of law in administrative work, and to the formation of citizens' awareness of the rule of law. It plays an important role in promoting the rule of law, protecting human rights and promoting the construction of socialist market economy. This system not only meets the need of developing socialist market economy, but also meets the demand of constructing harmonious society. However, with the advancement of democratization process and the diversity of people's value choice, the evaluation criteria for the procuratorial supervision system of administrative litigation are also diversified. The labor pain in the social transition period has deeply affected the construction of the system, and also made the defects and shortcomings of the system expand, and then restricted the operating effect of the system, and made the public become suspicious and distrust of the system. Therefore, under the premise of affirming the value and legitimacy of the system, we should face the existence of the problem squarely, and then put forward countermeasures to perfect the relevant system, which has the dual value of theory and practice to enhance the effect of procuratorial supervision to gain public approval. In addition, it should be emphasized that what the author advocates is a reform that can promote the smooth development of the economy and society. If the process of legalization and democratization advances too quickly, The resulting economic stagnation or even retrogression or social chaos is not allowed. By analyzing the connotation of the procuratorial supervision system in administrative litigation, the author discusses the necessity and function of the system, and analyzes the problems existing in the current procuratorial supervision system of administrative litigation in China. Supporting the continued existence and further strengthening of the procuratorial and supervisory system in administrative litigation, and proposing to broaden the scope of procuratorial supervision in administrative litigation by improving the legislative approach, To improve the procuratorial supervision system of administrative litigation by increasing the way of procuratorial supervision in administrative litigation.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.3
本文编号：2163340
[Abstract]:The administrative litigation system puts the high power in the traditional concept in front of the public rights, which is of milestone significance to the development and construction of the rule of law in our country. However, in practice, the legislative purpose of administrative litigation has not been fully realized. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a reasonable and effective way of supervision to supervise the operation of administrative power and the trial activities of the courts. And then ensure the smooth progress of administrative proceedings. Under this background, the administrative litigation procuratorial supervision system arises at the historic moment. The procuratorial supervision of administrative litigation is helpful to the institution of administrative proceedings, to standardizing administrative litigation activities, to promoting the process of the rule of law in administrative work, and to the formation of citizens' awareness of the rule of law. It plays an important role in promoting the rule of law, protecting human rights and promoting the construction of socialist market economy. This system not only meets the need of developing socialist market economy, but also meets the demand of constructing harmonious society. However, with the advancement of democratization process and the diversity of people's value choice, the evaluation criteria for the procuratorial supervision system of administrative litigation are also diversified. The labor pain in the social transition period has deeply affected the construction of the system, and also made the defects and shortcomings of the system expand, and then restricted the operating effect of the system, and made the public become suspicious and distrust of the system. Therefore, under the premise of affirming the value and legitimacy of the system, we should face the existence of the problem squarely, and then put forward countermeasures to perfect the relevant system, which has the dual value of theory and practice to enhance the effect of procuratorial supervision to gain public approval. In addition, it should be emphasized that what the author advocates is a reform that can promote the smooth development of the economy and society. If the process of legalization and democratization advances too quickly, The resulting economic stagnation or even retrogression or social chaos is not allowed. By analyzing the connotation of the procuratorial supervision system in administrative litigation, the author discusses the necessity and function of the system, and analyzes the problems existing in the current procuratorial supervision system of administrative litigation in China. Supporting the continued existence and further strengthening of the procuratorial and supervisory system in administrative litigation, and proposing to broaden the scope of procuratorial supervision in administrative litigation by improving the legislative approach, To improve the procuratorial supervision system of administrative litigation by increasing the way of procuratorial supervision in administrative litigation.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 姜明安;;行政诉讼中的检察监督与行政公益诉讼[J];法学杂志;2006年02期
2 常怡;重庆市、海南省人民检察院联合课题组;;民事行政裁判执行的检察监督[J];法学家;2006年04期
3 黄学贤;;行政诉讼撤诉若干问题探讨[J];法学;2010年10期
4 李蕾;肖国鹏;;行政诉讼检察监督论[J];甘肃政法成人教育学院学报;2005年04期
5 吴卫东;;行政诉讼中检察监督权力的完善性扩张[J];湖北行政学院学报;2006年04期
6 陈洁芳;当前行政诉讼检察监督制度的完善[J];检察实践;2004年01期
7 李学林;;检察建议在司法实践中的困境与出路[J];中国检察官;2006年06期
8 湛中乐,孙占京;论检察机关对行政诉讼的法律监督[J];法学研究;1994年01期
9 杨立新;民事行政诉讼检察监督与司法公正[J];法学研究;2000年04期
10 黄松有;检察监督与审判独立[J];法学研究;2000年04期
本文编号：2163340
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2163340.html
