贿赂犯罪证据制度的完善

发布时间：2018-08-09 10:12

【摘要】：在政治新常态下,贿赂犯罪已然成为对我国政治环境影响最大的腐败犯罪,但我国腐败犯罪立法方面滞后严重,与国际反腐败惩治机制接轨不畅,由于贿赂犯罪案件具有不同于普通刑事案件的特点,其证据也相应地具有特殊属性,在我国现有证据制度下,贿赂犯罪侦破难、取证难、认定难的问题难以获得实质性破解。因此,本文拟在分析问题症结的基础上,借鉴域外证据制度立法,结合我国实际,提出建立完善有中国特色的贿赂犯罪证据制度的路径构想。本文除去引言和结语,主体共计三大部分。各部分的梗概内容分别为:第一部分贿赂犯罪案件的证据问题分析。首先,从贿赂犯罪案件侦查面临的挑战入手,指出贿赂犯罪案件存在的立案难问题。其次,通过与普通刑事案件的证据相比较,分析贿赂犯罪案件证据所特有的特征。最后,在前述分析基础上,剖析贿赂案件在司法实践中面临的取证难、认定难问题。第二部分我国现行贿赂犯罪证据制度的现状和缺陷。首先,分析我国现行证据制度的现状,指出没有专门贿赂犯罪证据立法的不足。其次,剖析我国现行证据制度在认定贿赂犯罪中在证明标准设定、证明责任分配方面存在的缺陷。第三部分完善贿赂犯罪证据制度的路径设计。首先,从解决证明标准问题入手,提出建立多层次的贿赂犯罪证明标准。其次着眼于合理分配证明责任和解决取证难、认定难问题,借鉴国际国外成熟经验,分别确立贿赂推定规则和引入污点证人作证豁免制度,对两个规则、制度在打击惩治贿赂犯罪方面的价值和现实意义进行了分析论证,并就我国司法实践中,对贿赂推定原则的严格使用和对污点证人作证制度的有限适用进行规制,以期构建符合我国国情的贿赂犯罪证据制度。
[Abstract]:Under the new normal state of politics, bribery crime has become the most important corruption crime in our country. However, the legislation of corruption crime in our country lags behind seriously, and it is difficult to connect with the international anti-corruption punishment mechanism. Because the bribery crime case has the characteristic which is different from the ordinary criminal case, its evidence also has the special attribute correspondingly. Under the present evidence system of our country, the bribery crime detection difficulty, the evidence collection difficulty, the confirmation difficult question is difficult to obtain the substantive solution. Therefore, on the basis of analyzing the crux of the problem, this paper draws lessons from the legislation of the extraterritorial evidence system and combines the reality of our country, and puts forward the path of establishing and perfecting the evidence system of bribery crime with Chinese characteristics. Apart from the introduction and conclusion, there are three main parts in this paper. The main contents of each part are as follows: the first part is the analysis of evidence in bribery cases. First of all, starting with the challenge of bribery case investigation, the paper points out the problem of filing bribery crime case. Secondly, by comparing with the evidence of ordinary criminal cases, this paper analyzes the characteristics of evidence in bribery cases. Finally, on the basis of the above analysis, the paper analyzes the difficulty of obtaining evidence in the practice of bribery. The second part is the present situation and defect of the evidence system of bribery in our country. Firstly, it analyzes the present situation of evidence system in our country, and points out the deficiency of evidence legislation without special bribery crime. Secondly, it analyzes the defects of the current evidence system in establishing the standard of proof and distributing the burden of proof in the determination of bribery crime. The third part consummates the path design of bribery crime evidence system. First of all, starting from solving the problem of standard of proof, it puts forward the establishment of multi-level standard of proof of bribery crime. Secondly, with the aim of reasonably distributing the burden of proof and solving the problem of obtaining evidence, the author draws lessons from the mature experience of foreign countries, establishes the rules of presumption of bribery and introduces the exemption system of tainted witness. This paper analyzes and demonstrates the value and practical significance of the system in the fight against the crime of bribery, and regulates the strict use of the principle of presumption of bribery and the limited application of the system of testifying against tainted witnesses in our country's judicial practice. In order to construct the evidence system of bribery crime in accordance with the situation of our country.
【学位授予单位】：宁波大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】