2008-2012年湖南省无罪案件抗诉问题调查
发布时间：2018-08-11 14:52
【摘要】：刑事抗诉工作是人民检察院审判监督工作的重要内容,对于保障法院依法行使审判权发挥着不可替代的监督作用,但是,我国的刑事抗诉工作在司法实践中尚未完全按照刑事抗诉制度的理论设想发挥作用,刑事抗诉制度的建构本身也存在不合理之处。调研报告形成之前,笔者逐一分析了湖南省检察机关2008年至2012年无罪判决案件样本,发现湖南省这一期间无罪案件抗诉工作存在以下问题：提出抗诉比例过高,滥用抗诉权；抗诉质量不高,改判率偏低；少数案件该抗不抗,抗诉权缺位。形成问题的原因较为复杂,但最为直接的原因主要有以下三点：一是刑事诉讼中的抗诉标准模糊,刑法的罪状描述尚有不确定之处；二是检察机关内部运行机制不畅,三是法院内部体制失调。要改变这一现状,首先要通过对刑法和刑事诉讼法的修改,明确抗诉标准,减少检察机关面对无罪案件时的决定是否抗诉的两难抉择；其次是要理顺检察机关内部运行机制,贯彻抗诉的检委会决策机制和向上级院请示的制度,慎重提出抗诉,防止抗诉权的滥用,同时对于法院判决确有错误的,也要敢于抗诉,善于抗诉。再次是通过完善法院的内部考核机制和取消法院内部请示制度,避免抗诉权流于形式,保证抗诉的效果。
[Abstract]:Criminal protest work is an important part of the trial supervision work of the People's Procuratorate, which plays an irreplaceable role in ensuring the court to exercise its jurisdiction according to law. However, the criminal protest work in our country has not yet played its role in judicial practice according to the theoretical assumption of the criminal protest system, and the construction of the criminal protest system itself. Before the formation of the investigation report, the author analyzed the sample of innocent judgments of Hunan procuratorial organs from 2008 to 2012 one by one, and found that the following problems existed in the protest work of innocent cases in Hunan Province during this period: the proportion of protest was too high, the right of protest was abused; the quality of protest was not high, and the rate of sentence change was low in a few cases; The reasons for the formation of the problem are relatively complicated, but the most direct reasons are as follows: first, the standard of protest in criminal proceedings is vague, the description of the criminal law is still uncertain; second, the internal operation mechanism of the procuratorial organs is not smooth; third, the internal system of the court is out of order. To change this situation, first of all, there are still some uncertainties. It is necessary to clarify the standard of protest and reduce the dilemma of the procuratorial organs in deciding whether to protest in the face of innocent cases by amending the criminal law and the criminal procedural law; secondly, it is necessary to straighten out the internal operation mechanism of the procuratorial organs, implement the decision-making mechanism of the Procuratorial Committee for protest and the system of appealing to the superior court, put forward protest cautiously and prevent the abuse of the right of protest. At the same time, we should dare to protest and be good at protesting if the judgment of the court is wrong. Thirdly, we should improve the internal examination mechanism of the court and cancel the system of petition within the court to avoid the right of protest becoming mere formality and ensure the effect of protest.
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.2
本文编号：2177318
[Abstract]:Criminal protest work is an important part of the trial supervision work of the People's Procuratorate, which plays an irreplaceable role in ensuring the court to exercise its jurisdiction according to law. However, the criminal protest work in our country has not yet played its role in judicial practice according to the theoretical assumption of the criminal protest system, and the construction of the criminal protest system itself. Before the formation of the investigation report, the author analyzed the sample of innocent judgments of Hunan procuratorial organs from 2008 to 2012 one by one, and found that the following problems existed in the protest work of innocent cases in Hunan Province during this period: the proportion of protest was too high, the right of protest was abused; the quality of protest was not high, and the rate of sentence change was low in a few cases; The reasons for the formation of the problem are relatively complicated, but the most direct reasons are as follows: first, the standard of protest in criminal proceedings is vague, the description of the criminal law is still uncertain; second, the internal operation mechanism of the procuratorial organs is not smooth; third, the internal system of the court is out of order. To change this situation, first of all, there are still some uncertainties. It is necessary to clarify the standard of protest and reduce the dilemma of the procuratorial organs in deciding whether to protest in the face of innocent cases by amending the criminal law and the criminal procedural law; secondly, it is necessary to straighten out the internal operation mechanism of the procuratorial organs, implement the decision-making mechanism of the Procuratorial Committee for protest and the system of appealing to the superior court, put forward protest cautiously and prevent the abuse of the right of protest. At the same time, we should dare to protest and be good at protesting if the judgment of the court is wrong. Thirdly, we should improve the internal examination mechanism of the court and cancel the system of petition within the court to avoid the right of protest becoming mere formality and ensure the effect of protest.
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 兰耀军;刑事抗诉程序中两类问题评析[J];安徽广播电视大学学报;2004年03期
2 罗辉;晏礼蠡;;刑事抗诉的尴尬境地探讨[J];重庆工商大学学报(西部论坛);2008年S1期
3 张利兆;王焰明;张兆松;;刑事抗诉权运行机制的现状及其完善——以宁波市检察机关2006-2008年刑事抗诉案件为视角[J];法治研究;2009年11期
4 零霄宇;;制约检察机关刑事抗诉工作的问题、原因及对策初探[J];广西政法管理干部学院学报;2011年04期
5 周永年;;刑事二审程序中履行检察职能的若干问题研究[J];华东政法学院学报;2006年03期
6 范仲瑾;;当前刑事抗诉存在的问题及对策[J];中国检察官;2007年03期
7 王军;李景晗;张晓津;陈娟;;刑事抗诉工作问题与对策研究[J];人民检察;2006年12期
8 冀文孝;吕晋源;;制约基层检察院刑事抗诉工作的因素[J];人民检察;2006年23期
9 张玉军;;基层检察院刑事抗诉工作中存在的主要问题、原因及对策[J];天津市政法管理干部学院学报;2009年S1期
10 于洋;;改进刑事抗诉工作的思考[J];人民检察;2012年10期
，本文编号：2177318
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2177318.html
