律师侵权责任归责原则研究——以法经济学为分析视角

发布时间：2018-08-16 09:25

【摘要】：律师在参与信息披露过程中因故意或者过失产生侵权责任。依民法理论,对律师责任的归责原则既有严格责任原则又有过错责任原则。从成本角度看,严格责任会对律师带来较大的职业风险,降低其参与信息披露的积极性,并破坏交易市场的稳定,而过错责任又存在立法成本高、举证困难等障碍;从收益角度看,严格责任能提高律师预防虚假信息积极性,过错责任则会提高第三人预防虚假信息的积极性,在信息不对称的情况下,人们通常会认为律师预防虚假信息的能力要高于第三人。所以严格责任应成为立法的选择,但是律师预防虚假信息披露的能力又不可能是绝对的。因此对律师的侵权责任进行限制,既能降低律师的责任成本也能为保险机构接受律师的侵权责任创造条件。
[Abstract]:According to the civil law theory, the attorney's liability principle has both strict liability principle and fault liability principle. From the cost point of view, strict liability will bring great professional risks to lawyers, reduce their enthusiasm to participate in information disclosure and undermine transactions. The stability of the market, and the liability for fault also exists obstacles such as high legislative costs, difficulties in proof; from the perspective of income, strict liability can improve the lawyer's enthusiasm to prevent false information, fault liability will increase the third party's enthusiasm to prevent false information, in the case of information asymmetry, people usually think that lawyers can prevent false information. Therefore, strict liability should be the choice of legislation, but lawyers'ability to prevent false information disclosure can not be absolute. Therefore, restricting lawyers' tort liability can not only reduce the cost of lawyers'liability, but also create conditions for insurance institutions to accept lawyers' tort liability.
【作者单位】：吉林大学法学理论研究中心;
【基金】：山东省社科规划项目《司法语境中的法律原则适用问题研究》(13DFXZ02) 青岛市社科规划项目《青岛市生态文明建设的法治保障问题研究》(QDSKL50471)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D923.2

【参考文献】