未成年人社会调查报告的证据法解析及量刑运用

发布时间：2018-08-18 08:04

【摘要】：2012年通过的《最高人民法院关于适用中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法的解释》,将未成年人社会调查报告定位为法庭教育和量刑的参考。此种否定未成年人社会调查报告证据属性的做法与证据法的基本原理相悖,继而导致实践中报告适用的随意性、适用规则不统一现象继续存在。因此,必须明确社会调查报告的证据属性,从报告在刑事诉讼中的功能来看其属于定罪外的刑事处遇证据,而在证据种类的归属上报告应当是法定八种证据种类之外的新型证据。在刑事审判中,报告应在量刑程序中出示并明确规定报告的量刑证明规则,保证对报告进行充分、有效的量刑辩护,以期发挥社会调查报告在未成年人刑事审判中的特殊作用。
[Abstract]:The interpretation of the Supreme people's Court on the Application of the Criminal procedure Law of the people's Republic of China, adopted in 2012, defines the social investigation report of minors as a reference for court education and sentencing. The practice of denying the evidence attribute of the social investigation report of minors is contrary to the basic principle of the evidence law, which leads to the arbitrariness of reporting and application in practice, and the inconsistent phenomenon of applicable rules continues to exist. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify the evidentiary attributes of the social investigation report, and from the function of the report in the criminal proceedings, we can see that the report belongs to the criminal case outside the conviction. However, the report should be a new type of evidence in addition to the eight kinds of legal evidence. In the criminal trial, the report should be produced in the sentencing procedure and clearly stipulated the reported rules of sentencing proof, to ensure that the report is an adequate and effective defense of sentencing, in order to play a special role of social investigation report in juvenile criminal trial.
【作者单位】：吉林大学法学院;大庆师范学院法学院;
【基金】：吉林省社会科学基金项目“中国量刑程序改革问题研究——以《刑事诉讼法》再修改为背景的探讨”(2012BS24)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】