基层社会治理中刑事强制手段的滥用及规制——以刑事拘留的滥用为例
发布时间：2018-08-24 09:51
【摘要】：在基层社会治理中,刑事强制手段存在被滥用的情况:刑事拘留的对象往往被任意扩大;刑事拘留的使用目的也往往超出了刑事诉讼的保障功能,经常为安抚被害人、公众而对嫌疑人实施刑事拘留。这与基层政府刚性维稳的思路、执法人员和公众法治意识水平不高、相关法律制度的空白和缺陷都有很密切的关系。这种刑事强制手段的滥用因考虑了不相关因素而污染了公权力的正当性源头、错误地引导了公民法治观念、给少数人以刑事手段介入民事纠纷创造了机会,埋下了更深的隐患。以法治手段对此进行规制,有赖于立法上完善刑事拘留的严格适用标准;体制上建立刑事追诉目的性审查程序;司法上向前延伸强制措施必要性审查。
[Abstract]:In grass-roots social governance, criminal coercive means are abused: the object of criminal detention is often arbitrarily expanded; the use of criminal detention is often beyond the safeguard function of criminal proceedings, often in order to appease the victim. Criminal detention of suspects by the public. This is closely related to the rigid and stable thinking of the grass-roots government, the low level of law enforcement officers and the public awareness of the rule of law, and the blank and defects of the relevant legal system. The abuse of this kind of criminal coercive means pollutes the legitimate source of public power by considering irrelevant factors, misleads citizens' concept of rule of law, creates opportunities for a few people to intervene in civil disputes by criminal means, and buries deeper hidden dangers. The regulation by means of the rule of law depends on perfecting the strict applicable standards of criminal detention in legislation, establishing the criminal prosecution purpose examination procedure in the system, and examining the necessity of extending the coercive measures forward in the judicial field.
【作者单位】： 华北电力大学人文与社会科学学院;华北电力大学法政系;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金一般项目“基层治理中社会矛盾化解与法治保障研究”(项目编号:13BFX009)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D925.2
本文编号：2200455
[Abstract]:In grass-roots social governance, criminal coercive means are abused: the object of criminal detention is often arbitrarily expanded; the use of criminal detention is often beyond the safeguard function of criminal proceedings, often in order to appease the victim. Criminal detention of suspects by the public. This is closely related to the rigid and stable thinking of the grass-roots government, the low level of law enforcement officers and the public awareness of the rule of law, and the blank and defects of the relevant legal system. The abuse of this kind of criminal coercive means pollutes the legitimate source of public power by considering irrelevant factors, misleads citizens' concept of rule of law, creates opportunities for a few people to intervene in civil disputes by criminal means, and buries deeper hidden dangers. The regulation by means of the rule of law depends on perfecting the strict applicable standards of criminal detention in legislation, establishing the criminal prosecution purpose examination procedure in the system, and examining the necessity of extending the coercive measures forward in the judicial field.
【作者单位】： 华北电力大学人文与社会科学学院;华北电力大学法政系;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金一般项目“基层治理中社会矛盾化解与法治保障研究”(项目编号:13BFX009)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D925.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 冯治明,申谨;关于正确使用强制传唤的问题[J];政法论丛;1997年01期
2 ;[J];;年期
，本文编号：2200455
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2200455.html
