我国民事发回重审制度研究
发布时间：2018-08-27 10:38
【摘要】：在我国，发回重审制度是民事诉讼程序中的一项重要制度，关于发回重审制度，世界上许多国家并没有相关的专门法律规定。但毋须讳言的是，我国的发回重审制度仍然存在一定的问题。最为突出的表现之一就是有明显的重实体而轻程序的倾向。由于重实体而轻程序导致在司法实践中当事人很多程序方面的权利根本没有可实现的途径，程序选择权仅仅成了“摆设”。目前，我国的发回重审制度还不健全，，发回重审制度缺乏相应的监督制约机制，加之法律对于发回事由的规定也不够明晰，只是简单强调审判权为本位，这就容易滋生二审法院法官滥用发回重审权的现象。因此，本着尊重当事人的诉讼主体地位的态度，以明确当事人的程序选择权为出发点，以完善发回重审制度的事由、范围和标准的相关规定为主要内容，从司法机关内部的司法实践到相关法律法规建设等多方面对发回重审制度进行完善，以期实现司法的效率与公正。
[Abstract]:In our country, the system of retrial is an important system in the civil procedure. Many countries in the world do not have special legal provisions on the system of retrial. But needless to say, there are still some problems in the system of retrial. One of the most prominent manifestations is the apparent tendency to emphasize substance over procedure. Due to the importance of substance over procedure, there is no way to realize many procedural rights of the parties in judicial practice, and the choice of procedure is only a "decoration". At present, the retrial system in our country is not perfect, the system lacks the corresponding supervision and restriction mechanism, and the provisions of the law on the reasons for the return are not clear enough, only simply emphasizing the jurisdiction as the standard. This is easy to breed the second trial court judge abuse of the right to retrial phenomenon. Therefore, in line with the attitude of respecting the position of the litigant as the subject of the proceedings, taking the procedure option of the party as the starting point, the main content is to improve the cause, scope and relevant provisions of the standard for the retrial system. From the judicial practice within the judiciary to the construction of relevant laws and regulations, the system of retrial is improved in order to achieve the efficiency and justice of the judiciary.
【学位授予单位】：黑龙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.1
本文编号：2207024
[Abstract]:In our country, the system of retrial is an important system in the civil procedure. Many countries in the world do not have special legal provisions on the system of retrial. But needless to say, there are still some problems in the system of retrial. One of the most prominent manifestations is the apparent tendency to emphasize substance over procedure. Due to the importance of substance over procedure, there is no way to realize many procedural rights of the parties in judicial practice, and the choice of procedure is only a "decoration". At present, the retrial system in our country is not perfect, the system lacks the corresponding supervision and restriction mechanism, and the provisions of the law on the reasons for the return are not clear enough, only simply emphasizing the jurisdiction as the standard. This is easy to breed the second trial court judge abuse of the right to retrial phenomenon. Therefore, in line with the attitude of respecting the position of the litigant as the subject of the proceedings, taking the procedure option of the party as the starting point, the main content is to improve the cause, scope and relevant provisions of the standard for the retrial system. From the judicial practice within the judiciary to the construction of relevant laws and regulations, the system of retrial is improved in order to achieve the efficiency and justice of the judiciary.
【学位授予单位】：黑龙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘敏;;民事诉讼发回重审制度之探讨[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2011年02期
2 蓝宇,刘瑾;对我国民事诉讼发回重审制度的反思及重构[J];法律适用;2005年10期
3 王超;;刑事初审程序对刑事第二审构造的影响[J];华东政法大学学报;2008年02期
4 王福华;融天明;;民事诉讼发回重审制度之检讨[J];法学研究;2007年01期
5 陈杭平;;组织视角下的民事诉讼发回重审制度[J];法学研究;2012年01期
6 王福华;融天明;;民事诉讼发回重审制度之检讨[J];民事程序法研究;2007年00期
7 罗发兴;;析程序瑕疵的民事上诉案件发回重审之避免[J];人民司法;2009年03期
8 欧阳波;;我国民事诉讼发回重审制度的完善[J];司法改革论评;2010年00期
9 张玉录;建议取消发回重审制度[J];山东审判;1999年02期
10 王亚明;民事发回重审制度的检讨与重构[J];天津市政法管理干部学院学报;2005年04期
本文编号：2207024
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2207024.html
