论藏区赔命价现代化的发生逻辑
发布时间：2018-08-27 14:07
【摘要】：赔命价的复兴是当代藏区刑事法制建设面临的难题,此难题是中国刑事法制现代化必须克服的一个环节。赔命价的现代化有其自身的发生逻辑。在现代民族国家的建构过程中,中国人选择的单一制国家体制使藏区与内地省份(或地区)具有相同法律地位的行政单元,而单一制国家体制背后的法制统一原则天然地排斥少数民族刑事习惯。国家垄断刑事司法权意味着,只有经过国家认可的少数民族习惯规则中的有益因素才能名正言顺的进入刑事司法,其他与刑事法制相悖的均在扫除之列。所以,作为藏区刑事纠纷解决规则的赔命价习惯法无法保持其"原生态"独立存在于刑事法制之外,需要进行现代化改造。
[Abstract]:The revival of compensation price is a difficult problem in the construction of criminal legal system in contemporary Tibetan area, which is a link that must be overcome in the modernization of China's criminal legal system. The modernization of loss price has its own logic. In the process of constructing a modern nation-state, the Chinese chose a single system of state system to make the Tibetan region have the same legal status as the inland provinces (or regions). The principle of unity of legal system behind the unitary state system naturally excludes the criminal customs of ethnic minorities. The state monopoly of criminal jurisdiction means that only the beneficial factors in the customary rules of ethnic minorities that have been approved by the state can enter the criminal justice in a proper way, and the others that are contrary to the criminal legal system are all swept away. Therefore, as the criminal dispute settlement rules in Tibetan area, the customary law of compensation price can not keep its "original ecology" independent from the criminal legal system, so it needs to be modernized.
【作者单位】： 曲阜师范大学法学院;
【基金】：中国博士后科学基金第53批面上资助项目“习惯法的现代性命运”(资助编号:2013M531571)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D925.2
本文编号：2207515
[Abstract]:The revival of compensation price is a difficult problem in the construction of criminal legal system in contemporary Tibetan area, which is a link that must be overcome in the modernization of China's criminal legal system. The modernization of loss price has its own logic. In the process of constructing a modern nation-state, the Chinese chose a single system of state system to make the Tibetan region have the same legal status as the inland provinces (or regions). The principle of unity of legal system behind the unitary state system naturally excludes the criminal customs of ethnic minorities. The state monopoly of criminal jurisdiction means that only the beneficial factors in the customary rules of ethnic minorities that have been approved by the state can enter the criminal justice in a proper way, and the others that are contrary to the criminal legal system are all swept away. Therefore, as the criminal dispute settlement rules in Tibetan area, the customary law of compensation price can not keep its "original ecology" independent from the criminal legal system, so it needs to be modernized.
【作者单位】： 曲阜师范大学法学院;
【基金】：中国博士后科学基金第53批面上资助项目“习惯法的现代性命运”(资助编号:2013M531571)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D925.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前5条
1 曹廷生;;博弈中共生:赔命价与恢复性司法的对话[J];内蒙古农业大学学报(社会科学版);2007年03期
2 南杰·隆英强;;藏族赔命价习惯法对我国刑事司法的挑战及其可能贡献[J];民间法;2009年00期
3 马丛丛;;藏族习惯法之现代恢复性司法理念审视——从“赔命价”、“赔血价”说起[J];商业文化(上半月);2011年07期
4 杨X;;刑事和解制度再探析——以藏族“赔命价”习惯法为视角[J];河南司法警官职业学院学报;2013年04期
5 张锐智;黄卫;;论藏传佛教精神与司法权威的结合──藏族“赔命价”处理模式改革探析[J];中国政法大学学报;2011年06期
，本文编号：2207515
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2207515.html
