司法拍卖无效认定程序体系论——从最高人民法院指导案例35号谈起

发布时间：2018-08-27 14:31

【摘要】：最高人民法院指导案例35号确立了法院依职权认定拍卖无效的规则,而最高人民法院《关于人民法院办理执行异议和复议案件若干问题的规定》确定了通过执行异议程序撤销拍卖成交裁定的规则。鉴于最高人民法院对相同的问题却给出不同的处理方案,实有对司法拍卖无效认定问题进行系统思考的必要。司法拍卖应以公法性为基本定位,以程序安定性为制度设计的逻辑起点,司法拍卖的无效认定应仅限于拍卖严重违反程序规定的情形。司法拍卖的无效认定应以执行标的执行终结前、执行标的执行终结后至执行程序结案前和执行程序结案之后为时间节点,分别确立不动产拍卖成交审查裁定程序、通过执行异议撤销拍卖程序和拍卖裁定审查程序。
[Abstract]:The Supreme people's Court directed case 35 to establish the rule that the court decided ex officio that the auction was invalid. The Supreme people's Court, "provisions on handling execution objections and reconsideration cases by the people's Court", determined the rules for annulling the auction transaction order through the execution objection procedure. In view of the fact that the Supreme people's Court gives different solutions to the same problems, it is necessary to think about the invalidation of judicial auction systematically. Judicial auction should take public law as the basic orientation and procedural stability as the logical starting point of the system design. The invalidation of judicial auction should be limited to the serious violation of procedural regulations. The invalidation of judicial auction shall be determined before the execution of the execution object, between the execution of the execution object and the completion of the execution procedure and after the completion of the execution procedure as the time node, and the procedures for the examination and adjudication of the transaction of the real estate auction shall be established separately. The procedure for withdrawing the auction and the examination of the auction ruling through execution of the objection.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学;
【基金】：中国法学会2016年度部级法学研究自选课题《国家治理视角下的“执行不能”问题研究》(CLS(2016)D124) 中国法学会2015年度部级法学研究青年调研项目《司法拍卖实施状况评估》(CLS(2015)Y08) 西南政法大学青年教师学术创新团队资助项目(2016XZCXTD-07);西南政法大学校级重点项目(2015XZZD-16)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D926.2

【参考文献】