民事虚假诉讼的程序法规制
发布时间：2018-08-29 10:42
【摘要】：随着社会的发展、民事主体法律意识的不断提高,诉讼在纠纷的解决中发挥重要作用。民事诉讼原本是自然人、法人和其他组织等平等主体依靠司法强制力解决民事纠纷、维护权益的一种方式。近年来,一些不法分子利用法律的空白与漏洞,恶意串通虚构不存在的法律关系和事实、伪造证据,在表面合法的诉讼形式下,通过虚假自认、虚假调解等诉讼行为,欺骗法院作出错误的裁判或调解,以实现其非法目的。这种诉讼就是虚假诉讼,其本质特征为当事人诉诸法院解决的纠纷是虚假的。虚假诉讼不仅侵害他人合法利益,还会损害司法权威、浪费司法资源。面对虚假诉讼持续“升温”的态势,学界和实务界对虚假诉讼的防范与治理均日益重视。《民事诉讼法》将诚实信用原则明文化、法定化以及《刑法修正案(九)》增加虚假诉讼罪,对虚假诉讼的规制具有重要意义。本文从虚假诉讼的概念入手,分析其产生的原因,结合司法实践中虚假诉讼的案件类型,从程序法的角度提出规制虚假诉讼的建议。
[Abstract]:With the development of society and the improvement of the legal consciousness of civil subjects, litigation plays an important role in the settlement of disputes. Civil litigation is originally a way for natural persons, legal persons and other organizations to rely on judicial coercion to solve civil disputes and safeguard their rights and interests. In recent years, some lawbreakers have exploited gaps and loopholes in the law, maliciously colluded with fictional legal relations and facts, falsified evidence, and through false self-admission, false mediation, and other litigation acts under the apparently legitimate form of litigation. To deceive a court into making a wrong decision or mediation in order to achieve its unlawful purpose. This kind of lawsuit is a false lawsuit, whose essential characteristic is that the dispute that the litigant applies to the court to resolve is false. False litigation not only infringes the legitimate interests of others, but also damages judicial authority and wastes judicial resources. In the face of the situation of "heating up" continuously in false litigation, the academic and practical circles pay more and more attention to the prevention and management of false litigation. The legalization and the increase of the crime of false litigation in Criminal Law Amendment (9) are of great significance to the regulation of false litigation. This article starts with the concept of false litigation, analyzes the causes of its emergence, combines the types of cases of false litigation in judicial practice, and puts forward some suggestions for regulating false litigation from the point of view of procedural law.
【学位授予单位】：南昌大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.1
本文编号：2210953
[Abstract]:With the development of society and the improvement of the legal consciousness of civil subjects, litigation plays an important role in the settlement of disputes. Civil litigation is originally a way for natural persons, legal persons and other organizations to rely on judicial coercion to solve civil disputes and safeguard their rights and interests. In recent years, some lawbreakers have exploited gaps and loopholes in the law, maliciously colluded with fictional legal relations and facts, falsified evidence, and through false self-admission, false mediation, and other litigation acts under the apparently legitimate form of litigation. To deceive a court into making a wrong decision or mediation in order to achieve its unlawful purpose. This kind of lawsuit is a false lawsuit, whose essential characteristic is that the dispute that the litigant applies to the court to resolve is false. False litigation not only infringes the legitimate interests of others, but also damages judicial authority and wastes judicial resources. In the face of the situation of "heating up" continuously in false litigation, the academic and practical circles pay more and more attention to the prevention and management of false litigation. The legalization and the increase of the crime of false litigation in Criminal Law Amendment (9) are of great significance to the regulation of false litigation. This article starts with the concept of false litigation, analyzes the causes of its emergence, combines the types of cases of false litigation in judicial practice, and puts forward some suggestions for regulating false litigation from the point of view of procedural law.
【学位授予单位】：南昌大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李浩;;虚假诉讼与对调解书的检察监督[J];法学家;2014年06期
2 任重;;论虚假诉讼:兼评我国第三人撤销诉讼实践[J];中国法学;2014年06期
3 邢和平;;浅议虚假诉讼中检察监督的完善[J];中国检察官;2014年17期
4 张卫平;;中国第三人撤销之诉的制度构成与适用[J];中外法学;2013年01期
5 邓嵘;;虚假诉讼的模型化识别及防范治理——基于诉讼结构的视角[J];福建警察学院学报;2013年01期
6 宋朝武;;虚假诉讼法律规制的理性思考[J];河南社会科学;2012年12期
7 卢建平;任江海;;虚假诉讼的定罪问题探究——以2012年《民事诉讼法》修正案为视角[J];政治与法律;2012年11期
8 吴大华;王晓伟;;诉讼欺诈行为概念辨析[J];法治研究;2012年11期
9 张卫平;;第三人撤销判决制度的分析与评估[J];比较法研究;2012年05期
10 朱健;;论虚假诉讼及其法律规制[J];法律适用;2012年06期
，本文编号：2210953
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2210953.html
