刑事速裁程序辩护状况的调查与分析

发布时间：2018-08-29 13:10

【摘要】：全国人民代表大会常务委员会于2014年6月27日颁布《关于授权最高人民法院、最高人民检察院在部分地区开展刑事案件速裁程序试点工作的决定》;在授权后,最高人民法院、最高人民检察院联合公安部、司法部于2014年8月22日出台《关于在部分地区开展刑事案件速裁程序试点工作的办法》。上述两个规定的出台标志着为期两年的刑事速裁程序正式开始实施。速裁程序的开展,引起了法律界和社会公众的关注和持续热议。经过两年的试点工作,刑事速裁程序在取得一定成绩的同时也暴露出一些弊端。本文以刑事速裁程序的辩护状况为研究对象,结合实地调研对辩护状况进行研究。辩护权涉及到被追诉人的知悉权,有利于实现程序正义,进而实现案件的公平与正义。速裁程序有利于诉讼效率的提高,司法资源的节约以及诉讼成本的降低,然而司法机关在追求诉讼效率的同时,会侵犯被追诉人参与诉讼的权利,尤其是辩护权。本文共分为三个部分:第一部分为刑事速裁程序中辩护的重要作用。辩护在刑事速裁程序中可以维护被追诉人的合法权益,有利于实现程序正当,有利于提高司法效率。第二部分为刑事速裁程序中辩护现状分析。笔者对部分试点法院进行实地调研,发现刑事速裁程序中辩护存在的问题,并分析成因。第三部分为完善刑事速裁程序中辩护的若干建议。笔者结合实地调查的问题和成因提出以下建议:扩大法律援助对象的范围;落实值班律师制度;有效衔接法律援助程序与刑事速裁程序;提高律师参与速裁程序的积极性。
[Abstract]:On 27 June 2014, the standing Committee of the National people's Congress promulgated the decision on authorizing the Supreme people's Court and the Supreme people's Procuratorate to carry out the pilot work of expediting the adjudication of criminal cases in some areas; after the authorization, the Supreme people's Court, On August 22, 2014, the Supreme people's Procuratorate jointly with the Ministry of Public Security and the Ministry of Justice issued the "measures on the pilot work of expediting the adjudication procedure for Criminal cases in some regions". The introduction of these two regulations marks the start of a two-year criminal procedure. The rapid adjudication procedure has aroused the attention of the legal profession and the public. After two years of pilot work, the criminal quick-adjudication procedure has made some achievements at the same time also exposed some drawbacks. In this paper, the defense status of criminal quick-adjudication procedure as the research object, combined with field research to study the defense situation. The right of defense involves the right to know of the accused, which is beneficial to the realization of procedural justice, and then to the fairness and justice of the case. The quick adjudication procedure is beneficial to the improvement of litigation efficiency, the saving of judicial resources and the reduction of litigation cost. However, when the judicial organs pursue the efficiency of litigation, they will violate the right of the accused to participate in the proceedings, especially the right of defense. This paper is divided into three parts: the first part is the important role of defense in the criminal procedure. Defense can safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the accused in the criminal adjudication procedure, which is conducive to the realization of due process and the improvement of judicial efficiency. The second part is the analysis of the present situation of defense in the criminal adjudication procedure. Based on the field investigation of some trial courts, the author finds out the problems existing in the criminal procedure and analyzes the causes. The third part is to improve the criminal procedure in the defense of a number of suggestions. Combined with the problems and causes of field investigation, the author puts forward the following suggestions: to expand the scope of legal aid objects; to implement the duty lawyer system; to effectively link up the legal aid procedure with the criminal speedy adjudication procedure; and to improve the enthusiasm of lawyers to participate in the speedy adjudication procedure.
【学位授予单位】：山西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】