仲裁协议纠纷司法审查阶段制度的国际比较与我国的借鉴

发布时间：2018-08-30 13:04

【摘要】：仲裁自古以来在很多国家或地区都是一种重要的争议解决制度,其作用在当代更广的范围内越来越重要。然而,仲裁是以存在有效的仲裁协议为基石的,《纽约公约》等国际条约及众多国家或地区的制定法都允许当事人就仲裁协议的效力或涵盖范围纠纷提请司法审查。由于没有国际统一法的约束,各个国家或地区关于仲裁协议纠纷司法审查阶段的制度并不一致。大体而言,以法国和瑞士等为代表的国家或地区禁止或限制法院在仲裁裁决作成之前对仲裁协议的纠纷进行司法审查,其他国家或地区则对当事人在仲裁裁决作成之前的各阶段就仲裁协议纠纷提请司法审查的行为不加禁止或限制。我国内地关于仲裁协议纠纷司法审查阶段的制度规范存在诸多缺陷,包括将当事人对仲裁协议效力的异议不合理地推迟到人民法院首次开庭前、未指明在人民法院司法审查期间仲裁程序可否推进、没有考虑到仲裁机构就仲裁协议纠纷在先作出的决定是否具有终局效力的问题等。对于这些缺陷,我国内地应当借鉴境外的良好规则,主要通过修订《仲裁法》的方式进行弥补。
[Abstract]:Arbitration has been an important dispute settlement system in many countries and regions since ancient times, and its role is becoming more and more important in a wider range of contemporary times. In general, countries and regions represented by France and Switzerland prohibit or restrict disputes over arbitration agreements before arbitral awards are made. Other countries or regions have no prohibition or restriction on the parties'submission to judicial review of arbitration agreement disputes at all stages before the arbitration award is made. There are many defects in the system of judicial review of arbitration agreement disputes in Mainland China, including the difference of the effectiveness of arbitration agreement between the parties. The discussion was unreasonably postponed to the first session of the People's Court, without specifying whether the arbitration procedure could be advanced during the judicial review of the People's Court, without considering whether the arbitration institution's decision on the dispute over the arbitration agreement has final effect or not. The arbitration law is amended to make up for it.
【作者单位】：上海财经大学法学院;
【分类号】：D915.7;D925.7

【相似文献】