我国非法实物证据排除规则适用问题的研究

发布时间：2018-09-01 20:32

【摘要】：近年来,随着世界各国对人权保障的愈发重视,非法实物证据排除规则的构建也引起了各国立法者和学者的普遍关注。我国虽然确立了非法实物证据排除规则,但是由于立法对于非法实物证据排除规则规范的过于笼统模糊,可操作性不强,加之受其他制度的影响,非法实物证据排除规则在实践中的运用并不理想。本文通过对我国非法实物证据排除规则的立法与实践困境进行梳理以及非对法实物证据难以排除的原因进行分析,并且在借鉴域外经验的基础上,提出完善我国非法实物证据排除规则的建议,以期该制度能更好的服务于我国的社会。本文第一章对我国的非法实物证据排除规则的价值进行分析,包括人权保障的需要,实现司法公正的必然要求,借此论证非法实物排除规则在我国建立的必要性。第二章讨论了我国非法实物证据排除在立法上和实践中困境。分析了困境源自于对我国非法实物证据排除的范围、排除条件。第三章讨论非法实物证据难以排除的原因。从程序性裁判空间的缺失、案卷移送制度的影响、相互印证规则运用的形式化、证据能力和证明力关系的错乱、公检法三机关关系的异化五个层面进行原因分析。第四章指出完善我国非法实物证据排除规则可从扩大非法实物证据的排除范围、完善非法实物证据排除规则的条件、建立独立的程序性裁判空间、明确非法实物证据的排除基点。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the increasing attention paid to the protection of human rights in the world, the construction of the rule of exclusion of illegal physical evidence has also aroused the general concern of legislators and scholars in various countries. Although our country has established the illegal physical evidence exclusion rule, but because the legislation to the illegal physical evidence exclusion rule norm is too general and vague, the operability is not strong, in addition to the influence of other systems. The application of the exclusion rule of illegal physical evidence in practice is not ideal. This paper analyzes the legislative and practical dilemma of the exclusion rules of illegal physical evidence in our country, and analyzes the reasons why it is difficult to exclude the legal material evidence, and on the basis of drawing lessons from the extraterritorial experience, This paper puts forward some suggestions to perfect the exclusion rules of illegal physical evidence in order to serve our society better. The first chapter analyzes the value of the exclusionary rule of illegal physical evidence in our country, including the need of human rights protection, the inevitable requirement of realizing judicial justice, and thus demonstrates the necessity of establishing the rule of illegal material object exclusion in our country. The second chapter discusses the dilemma of illegal physical evidence exclusion in legislation and practice. This paper analyzes the scope and conditions of the exclusion of illegal physical evidence in China. The third chapter discusses the reasons why illegal physical evidence is difficult to rule out. The reasons are analyzed from the following five aspects: the absence of procedural adjudication space, the influence of case file transfer system, the formalization of the application of mutual corroboration rules, the disorder of the relationship between the ability of evidence and the power of proof, and the alienation of the relationship among the three organs of the Public Security Bureau, the Procuratorate and the Court. The fourth chapter points out that perfecting the exclusion rules of illegal physical evidence in our country can expand the exclusion scope of illegal physical evidence, perfect the conditions of the exclusion rules of illegal physical evidence, and establish an independent procedural adjudication space. To clarify the exclusion basis of illegal physical evidence.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】