论民事诉讼审前程序的立法完善

发布时间：2018-09-04 15:51

【摘要】：本文通过四个部分对民事诉讼审前程序的适用与完善进行了分析与研究：第一部分，初步探讨了民事诉讼审前程序的基础理论，界定了民事诉讼审前程序的概念，明确了它的特征和功能。首先，确立符合其本质的名称，并且通过对研究学者们提出的各种观点的比较和研究，选择归纳出了民事诉讼审前程序的定义；其次，从其多元主体参与、时间的特定性以及程序的确定性等三个方面归纳阐述了其特征；最后，归纳总结了民事诉讼审前程序的三个重要功能，即明确争点、收集固定证据以及促进案件提前终结。第二部分，，对两大法系主要国家的审前程序进行了研究，主要研究了英国、美国、法国、日本以及德国的审前程序的发展变革过程，并研究分析了两大法系的几个主要国家的审前程序的相同点和不同点。第三部分，主要对我国民事诉讼审前程序的现状进行了考察和评价。首先，对新《民事诉讼法》与最高人民法院司法解释中审前程序的内容进行了系统的介绍；其次，结合我国现实国情与现状，对我国的民事诉讼审前程序存在的弊端进行了分析和介绍。第四部分，对我国民事诉讼审前程序的完善与适用进行了研讨，并提出了一些改善的观点。首先，对于审前程序的基本制度重构应当借鉴协同主义的合理内核，转变审前程序的理念，从职权主义向当事人主义进行转变，对法官的释明义务做出明确的规定，在民事诉讼中实行集中审理主义；其次，细化当事人诉答活动的相关规定；第三，确定证据交换的范围、主持者、交换的时间次数和方式，进一步的规范我国的证据交换制度，完善与证据交换直接相关的制度；最后，通过明确争点整理的适用范围、主客体、方法以及确定其终结及效力来完善审前程序中的争点整理。笔者通过上述研究，希望能够对民事诉讼审前程序的改革做出贡献。
[Abstract]:This paper analyzes and studies the application and perfection of civil pretrial procedure through four parts: the first part discusses the basic theory of civil pretrial procedure and defines the concept of civil pretrial procedure. Its features and functions are clarified. First of all, establish the name that accords with its essence, and through the comparison and research of the various viewpoints put forward by the scholars, select and sum up the definition of the civil pretrial procedure; secondly, participate from its multiple subjects. Finally, it summarizes the three important functions of the pretrial procedure in civil litigation, that is, defining the points of contention, collecting fixed evidence and promoting the early termination of the case. In the second part, the author studies the pretrial procedure in the main countries of the two legal systems, mainly studying the process of the development and transformation of the pretrial procedure in the United Kingdom, the United States, France, Japan and Germany. It also analyzes the similarities and differences of pretrial procedures in several major countries of the two legal systems. The third part mainly investigates and evaluates the present situation of civil procedure in our country. Firstly, it systematically introduces the content of the pretrial procedure in the new Civil procedure Law and the judicial interpretation of the Supreme people's Court. This paper analyzes and introduces the drawbacks of the pretrial procedure in civil litigation in China. In the fourth part, the author discusses the perfection and application of the pretrial procedure in civil litigation in China, and puts forward some points of improvement. First of all, the reconstruction of the basic system of pretrial procedure should draw lessons from the reasonable core of Synergy, change the concept of pretrial procedure, change from the doctrine of authority to the doctrine of the parties, and make a clear stipulation on the interpretation obligation of the judge. Implement centralism in civil proceedings; secondly, refine the relevant provisions of litigant action; third, determine the scope of evidence exchange, the host, the time and mode of exchange, and further standardize the evidence exchange system in our country. Improve the system directly related to the exchange of evidence; finally, by clarifying the scope of application, subject and object, methods and determination of its termination and effectiveness in the pretrial process to perfect the arrangement of points. Through the above research, I hope to contribute to the reform of civil pretrial procedure.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.1

【参考文献】