当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 诉讼法论文 >

行政诉讼地域管辖制度的完善研究

发布时间:2018-09-07 11:02
【摘要】:以行政诉讼地域管辖的相关理论为基础,通过结合《行政诉讼法修正案(草案)》的立法规定以及改革尝试来分析我国当前行政诉讼地域管辖制度的现实困境,并借鉴域外行政诉讼地域管辖制度的先进经验,提出进一步完善行政诉讼地域管辖制度的构想。 文章分为五个部分: 绪论部分结合司法实践探索情况,对文章的选题背景进行阐述。 第一章,行政诉讼地域管辖的基本理论。该章首先论述行政诉讼的含义及其基本特征,并进一步论述行政诉讼地域管辖的含义及其基本特征。通过对行政诉讼地域管辖制度的基本理论进行梳理,为后文论述奠定基点。 第二章,我国行政诉讼地域管辖制度的立法现状及缺陷分析。通过对行政诉讼地域管辖制度的立法现状进行梳理,本章在第一章的基础上,结合我国的立法现状归纳出行政诉讼地域管辖制度的缺陷所在,得出机械套用民事诉讼“原告就被告”原则、法律规定滞后的结论。最后,从制度原因和实践原因两方面对行政诉讼地域管辖制度存在缺陷的原因进行了全面分析。 第三章,域外行政诉讼地域管辖制度及其借鉴。本章通过对两大法系国家行政诉讼地域管辖制度的介绍,为我国行政诉讼地域管辖制度的完善提供了借鉴启示。 第四章,,对当前实践中行政诉讼地域管辖制度探索的综述。本章对实践中异地管辖和集中管辖两大实践探索的改革尝试进行介绍,特别对实践工作中法院的行政审判数据进行总结研究,并作出评价。 第五章及结论部分,行政诉讼地域管辖制度的完善构想。本章首先对行政诉讼地域管辖的一般原则及立法规则进行重构,其次,结合立法现状,提出行政诉讼异地管辖制度进一步完善的具体构想。最后在改革尝试中南宁市各辖区法院的行政审判数据的基础上进行分析,并结合域外行政诉讼地域管辖的制度设计,建议以立法形式构建集中管辖制度。
[Abstract]:Based on the relevant theories of administrative litigation regional jurisdiction, this paper analyzes the current dilemma of administrative litigation regional jurisdiction system by combining the legislative provisions and reform attempts of "Administrative procedure Law Amendment (draft)". Drawing lessons from the advanced experience of the regional jurisdiction system of the foreign administrative litigation, this paper puts forward the conception of further perfecting the regional jurisdiction system of the administrative litigation. The article is divided into five parts: the introduction part combined with judicial practice to explore the background of the selection of the article. The first chapter is the basic theory of administrative litigation jurisdiction. This chapter first discusses the meaning of administrative litigation and its basic characteristics, and further discusses the meaning and basic characteristics of administrative litigation regional jurisdiction. Through combing the basic theory of the administrative litigation regional jurisdiction system, lay the foundation for the later discussion. The second chapter, the legislation status and defect analysis of our country administrative litigation regional jurisdiction system. By combing the current legislative situation of the administrative litigation regional jurisdiction system, this chapter summarizes the defects of the administrative litigation regional jurisdiction system on the basis of the first chapter, combined with the current legislative situation of our country. The conclusion is drawn that the principle of "plaintiff is defendant" and the legal provisions lag behind in mechanically applied civil action. Finally, the author analyzes the defects of the administrative litigation jurisdiction system from the two aspects of system reasons and practical reasons. The third chapter, the extraterritorial administrative litigation regional jurisdiction system and its reference. Through the introduction of the regional jurisdiction system of administrative litigation in the two legal system countries, this chapter provides a reference for the perfection of the regional jurisdiction system of administrative litigation in our country. The fourth chapter, the current practice of administrative proceedings in the exploration of regional jurisdiction system. This chapter introduces the reform attempts of the practice of jurisdiction in different places and centralized jurisdiction in practice, especially summarizes and studies the court's administrative trial data in practice, and makes an evaluation. The fifth chapter and the conclusion part, the administrative litigation district jurisdiction system consummates the idea. Firstly, this chapter reconstructs the general principles and legislative rules of administrative litigation jurisdiction. Secondly, combined with the current situation of legislation, the author puts forward the concrete idea of further perfection of administrative litigation jurisdiction system. Finally, on the basis of analyzing the administrative trial data of the courts in Nanning, and combining with the system design of the extraterritorial administrative litigation jurisdiction, it is suggested that the centralized jurisdiction system should be constructed in the form of legislation.
【学位授予单位】:广西民族大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D925.3

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 浙江高院课题组;包祥水;;行政案件管辖问题的调研报告[J];法律适用;2007年01期

2 张卫平;论我国法院体制的非行政化——法院体制改革的一种基本思路[J];法商研究(中南政法学院学报);2000年03期

3 张倩;;行政诉讼异地交叉管辖[J];法制与社会;2010年18期

4 王小娟;;完善我国行政诉讼制度的思考[J];法制与社会;2010年21期

5 章剑生;;行政诉讼法修改的基本立场[J];广东社会科学;2013年01期

6 章志远;;行政案件相对集中管辖制度之省思[J];法治研究;2013年10期

7 郑腾龙;;试论行政诉讼的地域管辖[J];法制与经济(下旬);2011年12期

8 梁凤云;;《行政诉讼法》修改八论[J];华东政法大学学报;2012年02期

9 李荣珍;潘娜;;论我国行政诉讼管辖制度的改革与完善[J];海南大学学报(人文社会科学版);2009年02期

10 王斌林;;行政诉讼异地审判的规范分析[J];南华大学学报(社会科学版);2011年03期



本文编号:2228074

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2228074.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户50a9d***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com