撤销民事执行申请的效力问题探究

发布时间：2018-09-09 13:06

【摘要】：新《民事诉讼法》及其司法解释,首次明确了撤销民事执行申请的适用条件,因撤销而终结执行的债权人可在执行时效内再次申请执行,但该规定过于笼统,具体操作上有欠规范,为探知规范未尽之内涵,利于制度的适用和完善,笔者深入探讨了撤销执行申请的法律效力:撤销可致执行程序终结、执行时效中断,依债权人之再次申请,执行程序可以再启,但与"申请恢复执行"严格区分,且该种再启不受2年时效约束。因撤销而终结执行后,当事人有权提出执行异议,执行机构对终结行为及债务人、执行标的物之强制措施应分情况决定是否予以撤销。再启程序时,执行机构可根据权利障碍和权利消灭抗辩事由的三种不同情形,做出不予执行、继续执行或终结执行的结论。
[Abstract]:The new Code of Civil procedure and its judicial interpretation, for the first time, clarify the applicable conditions for revoking an application for civil execution. Creditors whose execution is terminated as a result of revocation may apply for execution again within the time limit of execution, but this provision is too general. In order to find out the connotation of the standard and the application and perfection of the system, the author deeply discusses the legal effect of the revocation of the execution application: the revocation may lead to the termination of the execution procedure, the interruption of the execution limitation. On the creditor's re-application, the execution procedure may be restarted, but is strictly distinguished from the "application to resume execution", and the reopening is not subject to a two-year limitation period. After termination of execution due to revocation, the parties shall have the right to raise an enforcement objection, and the enforcement agency shall decide whether or not to cancel the execution of the subject matter according to the circumstances of the termination act and the debtor. When reopening procedure, the enforcement agency may make the conclusion that the execution is not carried out, continued or terminated according to the three different situations of the obstacle of right and the reason of the defense of right elimination.
【作者单位】：陕西省镇巴县人民法院执行局;陕西省镇巴县人民法院;
【分类号】：D925.1

【参考文献】