我国民事公益诉讼审判程序建构研究
[Abstract]:In our country, the cases of infringing on public interest occur frequently, and people also seek judicial remedy consciously. However, the important procedural problem of judicial remedy is that the trial procedure has not attracted the attention of the academic circles and the judicial practice circle. So far, the public interest litigation cases are still applied to the trial procedure of the traditional civil litigation. This not only brings inconvenience to the litigation activities of judges and parties, but also reduces the acceptability of adjudication results. Based on this, this paper constructs the trial procedure of public interest litigation in our country. The main contents of this paper are as follows: the first part, trial procedure and constructive logic. The trial procedure mainly involves the exercise of the jurisdiction and the right of action. The disposition of litigant's right of action and court's jurisdiction is different in different trial procedure because of the difference of its litigation object. Constructing trial procedure according to the nature of dispute as the object of litigation is the basic logic of the construction of trial procedure in civil public interest litigation in China. The second part, the predicament of the traditional procedure to try the civil public interest litigation. Civil public interest litigation and traditional litigation have different trial modes because of their different nature of disputes resolved. The traditional litigation takes "adversary judgment" as its basic structure, while the parties in civil public interest litigation gradually change from confrontation to cooperation. This kind of difference has caused a series of conflicts, resolving these conflicts is the direct purpose of constructing the trial procedure of public interest litigation. The third part, our country civil public interest lawsuit trial procedure construction. This part is the core of this article, civil public interest litigation trial procedure is one of the types of trial procedure, should follow the trial procedure construction logic. The concrete contents are mainly from three aspects: the specific design of the litigant's right of action, the specific design of the exercise of the court's jurisdiction and the res judicata of the judgment made after the trial of civil public interest litigation. The concrete construction of the right of action and jurisdiction is the core of this paper, and the author expounds it in detail.
【学位授予单位】:西南政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D925.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 纵博;;对法官依职权调查取证若干理论问题的澄清[J];法律适用;2013年10期
2 包秀露;;浅析我国法官调查取证权制度所遇到的挑战及完善[J];法制与经济(下旬);2012年04期
3 林海骏;;平等与协作:民事诉讼结构之探讨[J];中山大学研究生学刊(社会科学版);2012年01期
4 谭宗泽;杨靖文;;行政法结构失衡与行政诉讼功能变迁——一个结构功能主义的维度[J];西南政法大学学报;2011年05期
5 曹明德;刘明明;;论美国告发人诉讼制度及其对我国环境治理的启示[J];河北法学;2010年11期
6 赵欣;;各国民事公益诉讼制度比较法研究[J];前沿;2010年06期
7 宋朝武;;论公益诉讼的十大基本问题[J];中国政法大学学报;2010年01期
8 陈亮;;美国关于原告资格功能之争及其对我国的启示[J];河北法学;2009年07期
9 邓思清;;公益诉讼制度的程序构想[J];当代法学;2008年02期
10 高玉珍;;论公益诉讼与私益诉讼的关系[J];社会科学论坛(学术研究卷);2007年07期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 孙记;现代刑事诉讼结构论的法理学分析[D];吉林大学;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前7条
1 王琳琳;我国民事诉讼中法院职权取证研究[D];华侨大学;2012年
2 潘雪晴;民事公益诉讼程序研究[D];中国政法大学;2011年
3 李轶;举证责任及其分配在审判实践中的应用[D];华东政法大学;2010年
4 吴莹;论我国民事诉讼审前程序之完善[D];安徽大学;2006年
5 王艺华;对我国基层法院民事审判组织的研究[D];清华大学;2005年
6 周清;重构我国民事诉讼审前准备程序的法律思考[D];华东政法学院;2003年
7 李鑫;民事诉讼庭前程序比较研究[D];黑龙江大学;2004年
,本文编号:2237265
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2237265.html