对第三人撤销之诉原告适格的研究

发布时间：2018-09-12 08:09

【摘要】：2012年新修后的《民事诉讼法》第56条予以确立第三人撤销之诉制度,然而民事诉讼法学界大多数学者认为,新增的第三人撤销之诉制度与民事诉讼法的基本理论存在一些冲突和矛盾,主要体现在该制度的理论现状与司法现状之间存在断层,并不能够良好衔接,无法达到立法者预期目的即遏制虚假诉讼和保护第三人的正当权益。然而本文不再立足于第三人撤销之诉制度的理论与实践的差距抑或衔接问题,而是以事后救济和目的解释为视角,从既存的法律规范来分析该第三人撤销之诉制度的可行性。本文试图以该制度的适格原告为主线,通过制度分析,功能定位,并结合司法实例对该制度的适格原告进行类型化分析以进一步剖析该制度,并从诉的利益、起诉条件等角度分析了对该制度限制的必要性。
[Abstract]:Article 56 of the Civil procedure Law, which was revised in 2012, establishes the system of third party revocation. However, most scholars in the field of civil procedure law believe that, There are some conflicts and contradictions between the new system of revocation of third party and the basic theory of civil procedure law, which is mainly reflected in the fault between the theory and judicial status of the system, which can not be connected well. Failure to achieve the legislator's expectation is to curb false litigation and protect the legitimate rights and interests of third parties. However, this paper is no longer based on the gap between theory and practice of the system of revocation of the third party or the problem of convergence, but from the perspective of ex post relief and purpose explanation, analyzes the feasibility of the system of revocation of the action of the third party from the existing legal norms. This article attempts to take the suitably plaintiff of this system as the main line, through the system analysis, the function localization, and unifies the judicial example to carry on the type analysis to this system suitably plaintiff, and further analyzes the system, and from the benefit of the lawsuit, The necessity of restricting the system is analyzed from the point of view of prosecution conditions.
【学位授予单位】：太原科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】