远程审判与司法创新的路径探讨——兼论民间法的功能和定位
发布时间：2018-09-18 09:05
【摘要】：法院的远程审判制度作为一项司法制度创新,其价值主要表现为:远程审判制度是一项司法便民的举措;远程审判制度减少了诉讼成本、提高了审判的公开、透明和公正性;远程审判制度促进法制统一,加快法治文明的进程。同时对于远程审判存在三个方面的争议,即远程审判的合法性问题、适用条件以及经费保障问题。远程审判作为一个高科技手段在庭审中的运用,改变了"法律不入之地"的尴尬,同时给民间法的功能和定位带来了新的转变。在对远程审判制度价值论述的基础上,以小见大,对我国司法制度创新的路径进行有益的探索,认为中国司法制度的创新必须同时符合三个条件,即合法性、合民意性以及合社会发展性。
[Abstract]:As an innovation of the judicial system, the value of the remote trial system of the court is as follows: the remote trial system is a convenient measure for the administration of justice, the remote trial system reduces the litigation cost, and improves the openness, transparency and fairness of the trial. The remote trial system promotes the unification of the legal system and speeds up the process of civilization of the rule of law. At the same time, there are three controversies about the remote trial, namely, the legality of the remote trial, the applicable conditions and the financial guarantee. The application of remote trial as a high-tech means in the trial has changed the embarrassment of "the place where the law does not enter" and brought a new change to the function and orientation of the folk law. On the basis of expounding the value of the remote trial system, the author finds out the whole through a small part, and probes into the path of the innovation of the judicial system of our country. The author thinks that the innovation of the judicial system in China must meet three conditions simultaneously, that is, the legality. In line with public opinion and social development.
【作者单位】： 上海大学法学院;
【基金】：李瑜青教授主持的2011年度中国法学会(部级)重大研究课题《法律实施的保障机制研究》(CLS(2011)A04)的研究成果之一
【分类号】：D926.2
[Abstract]:As an innovation of the judicial system, the value of the remote trial system of the court is as follows: the remote trial system is a convenient measure for the administration of justice, the remote trial system reduces the litigation cost, and improves the openness, transparency and fairness of the trial. The remote trial system promotes the unification of the legal system and speeds up the process of civilization of the rule of law. At the same time, there are three controversies about the remote trial, namely, the legality of the remote trial, the applicable conditions and the financial guarantee. The application of remote trial as a high-tech means in the trial has changed the embarrassment of "the place where the law does not enter" and brought a new change to the function and orientation of the folk law. On the basis of expounding the value of the remote trial system, the author finds out the whole through a small part, and probes into the path of the innovation of the judicial system of our country. The author thinks that the innovation of the judicial system in China must meet three conditions simultaneously, that is, the legality. In line with public opinion and social development.
【作者单位】： 上海大学法学院;
【基金】：李瑜青教授主持的2011年度中国法学会(部级)重大研究课题《法律实施的保障机制研究》(CLS(2011)A04)的研究成果之一
【分类号】：D926.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 张钧;;法律多元理论及其在中国的新发展[J];法学评论;2010年04期
2 杨文杰;冯静;;回应的无力——读诺内特与塞尔兹尼克著《转变中的法律与社会:迈向回应型法》[J];河北经贸大学学报(综合版);2007年02期
3 赵斌;;民间法研究中的“现代化范式”与“法律多元”[J];江海学刊;2010年04期
4 付雄;叶三方;;论远程审判的适用规则——克服远程审判之不足的制度设计[J];内蒙古社会科学(汉文版);2011年04期
5 张，
本文编号：2247432
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2247432.html
