刑事自诉制度相关问题研究
[Abstract]:There are many problems in the system of private prosecution because of the partial deviation in the legislative theory and the roughness of the legislative technology in our country. In the case of private prosecution, there are intricate relations between the right to appeal and the right of public prosecution, and there are conflicts between each other. Moreover, the criminal behavior is becoming more and more subtle and complex, and the ability of the victim to prosecute the crime is very limited. This poses a great challenge to the exercise of the right to appeal. What is important is that the disconnection between substantive law and procedural law is becoming more and more serious, which will lead to the private prosecution's rights can not be effectively protected. The scope of private prosecution cases will not be set up in the criminal procedure law of major countries in the world, but the scope of private prosecution cases has been set up separately in our criminal procedure law and judicial interpretation, which leads to the inconsistency between procedural law and substantive law. The key to solve this problem lies in how to coordinate the relationship between the right of public prosecution and the right of self-prosecution, and how to choose the suitable way under the condition of the coexistence of public prosecution and private prosecution, such as whether public prosecution can be carried out or not, if public prosecution is initiated. The question of whether the victim can still prosecute himself. However, the private prosecution system has not introduced new laws and regulations in China in recent years, but there are still many problems in the existing criminal private prosecution system, so this paper should go deep into these fundamental problems in the criminal private prosecution system. Systematic research and analysis, and put forward perfect suggestions to realize the practical significance of legislation itself.
【学位授予单位】:内蒙古大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D925.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 邓伟艳;;对自诉权的理论解构[J];湖南农机;2007年01期
2 刘昀;;略论刑事自诉权的结构[J];法制与社会;2009年18期
3 丁万星,宋桂兰;“公诉转自诉”案件中之自诉权探微[J];河北法学;2002年S1期
4 郭宗才;被害人自诉权行使中存在的若干问题[J];法律适用;2004年10期
5 石红梅;;论刑事自诉权的配置[J];南京大学法律评论;2005年02期
6 石红梅;刑事自诉权的价值分析[J];江苏警官学院学报;2005年02期
7 郭宗才;;被害人自诉权研究[J];犯罪研究;2005年06期
8 韩毅琼;黄玮;;刑事司法中的自诉权与我国刑事自诉制度的重构[J];法制与社会;2007年05期
9 张璐;;刑事自诉权初探[J];运城学院学报;2008年01期
10 赵炜;;论检察机关对亲告罪的自诉权救济[J];天津市政法管理干部学院学报;2008年S1期
相关重要报纸文章 前4条
1 何伟亚 戴 翔;自诉人在诉讼中死亡的处理原则[N];人民法院报;2004年
2 河北省石家庄市长安区人民检察院 于书峰;轻伤害案件侦结后被害人应有自诉权[N];检察日报;2014年
3 梧州市人民检察院 陈玉;论轻伤害案件管辖问题[N];法治快报;2010年
4 吴卫军;刑事自诉:三方面问题待完善[N];检察日报;2005年
相关硕士学位论文 前9条
1 柴新萌;刑事自诉制度相关问题研究[D];内蒙古大学;2017年
2 杨春;刑事自诉权研究[D];南京师范大学;2004年
3 吴双;刑事自诉权研究[D];广西民族大学;2008年
4 邓伟艳;自诉制度研究[D];西南政法大学;2004年
5 吴铁刚;公诉权与自诉权关系研究[D];内蒙古大学;2008年
6 邱巧红;论公诉权与自诉权并存时的诉权行使[D];中国政法大学;2006年
7 杨智勋;论公诉权对自诉权的整合[D];重庆大学;2010年
8 宋桂兰;刑事自诉制度研究[D];中国政法大学;2002年
9 吴东;刑事自诉制度研究[D];安徽大学;2003年
,本文编号:2250410
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2250410.html