论我国民事诉讼支持起诉制度的完善

发布时间：2018-10-05 10:57

【摘要】：我国民事诉讼法规定了支持起诉制度意在保护当事人的诉讼权利、维护国家利益和社会公益，追求社会公正，顺利实现民事诉讼法的任务目标。但是由于该制度存在具体内容设计的不明确和司法实践的混乱，学术界对其亦产生了存废的争议，使得该制度一直难以得到发展，逐渐搁置在民事诉讼改革中的一隅。本文阐明支持起诉制度的理论依据，总结支持起诉制度存在的价值并与其他相关制度进行对比，以此述明支持起诉制度存在的必要性。再通过对支持起诉制度运行状况的分析，得出支持起诉制度在主体、范围和支持方式等方面的不足。再通过处分原则、平等原则等民事诉讼基本原则为指导完善该制度的基础，提出支持起诉制度从支持起诉完善的建议，以期对支持起诉制度的发展可以提供参考。本文分为四章：第一章为支持起诉制度的概念及理论基础。主要阐述支持起诉制度的基本概念、要素、形成条件，以及支持起诉制度的理论依据，，国家干预理论、公共信托理论、司法救济请求权；通过学术界对支持起诉制度的争议叙述废除说的理由，通过社会干预替代、道德规范性强、公益诉讼制度对于支持起诉制度的吸收。第二章为支持起诉制度存在的价值。针对上文所提及的废除问题，通过在制度层面上与法律援助制度、督促起诉制度、公益诉讼制度进行对比，说明支持起诉制度在制度层面上的价值；并且论述支持起诉制度对于维护弱势群体利益、社会公共利益的价值，突出支持起诉存在的必要性，反驳废弃说。第三章为支持起诉制度运行状况分析。介绍支持起诉制度的运行程序和程序运行中在制度设计上的不足；并结合司法实践对支持起诉在主体界定不具体、案件范围模糊、支持方式权利义务的不明确等方面提出不足之处。第四章为完善支持起诉制度的建议。确定支持起诉完善的基础，坚持处分原则、平等原则及支持起诉的便捷性。以这些基础为纲，从支持起诉主体、案件范围、支持方式三个方面对支持起诉制度进行完善，明确支持起诉主体的地位，权利义务；划分支持起诉案件的范围；确定支持起诉的支持方式以法律支持为主，经济支持等其他手段为辅；借鉴法庭之友制度提出支持起诉意见书和支持起诉决定书；借鉴英国公共法律服务制度增强支持起诉制度与其他制度的衔接，增强当事人对解决纠纷方式的选择，使得支持起诉制度可以更便捷。
[Abstract]:China's civil procedure law stipulates that the system of supporting prosecution is intended to protect the litigants' rights, safeguard the national interests and public welfare, pursue social justice, and smoothly realize the task goal of the civil procedure law. However, due to the uncertainty of the specific content design and the confusion of judicial practice, the academic circles also have a dispute about its existence or abolition, which makes it difficult to develop the system and is gradually shelved in the corner of the civil litigation reform. This paper clarifies the theoretical basis of supporting prosecution system, summarizes the value of supporting prosecution system and compares it with other related systems, and then states the necessity of supporting the existence of prosecution system. Through the analysis of the operating condition of the supporting prosecution system, the author draws the conclusion that the supporting prosecution system is deficient in the aspects of subject, scope and way of support. Based on the basic principles of civil action, such as the principle of disposition and the principle of equality, the author puts forward the suggestion of supporting the system of prosecution from the perspective of supporting the improvement of prosecution, in order to provide reference for the development of the system of supporting prosecution. This paper is divided into four chapters: the first chapter is the concept and theoretical basis of supporting prosecution system. It mainly expounds the basic concepts, elements, forming conditions of supporting the prosecution system, as well as the theoretical basis of supporting the prosecution system, the theory of state intervention, the theory of public trust, and the right of claim for judicial relief. Through the academic circles to support the prosecution system dispute narration abolishes the reason, through the social intervention substitution, the moral standard is strong, the public interest litigation system to support the prosecution system absorption. The second chapter is the value of supporting the existence of prosecution system. In view of the above mentioned abolition problems, through the system level and legal aid system, supervision and prosecution system, public interest litigation system to compare, explain the value of supporting the prosecution system in the system level; It also discusses the value of supporting prosecution system to safeguard the interests of vulnerable groups and social public interests, to highlight the necessity of supporting the existence of prosecution, and to refute the theory of abandonment. The third chapter is the analysis of the operation of supporting the prosecution system. This paper introduces the operating procedure of supporting the prosecution system and the deficiencies in the design of the system, and combines the judicial practice with the definition of the main body of the supporting prosecution is not specific, and the scope of the case is vague. The inadequacies of the rights and obligations of the support mode are pointed out. The fourth chapter is the suggestion of perfecting the system of supporting prosecution. Determine the basis of supporting prosecution, adhere to the principle of punishment, equality and convenience to support prosecution. Take these foundations as the outline, from support prosecution main body, the case scope, the support way three aspects carries on the consummation to support the prosecution system, clearly supports the main body's status, the rights and obligations, divides the scope of the support prosecution case; Legal support should be the main way to support prosecution, and other means such as economic support should be supplemented, and amicus curiae system should be used for reference to support prosecution opinion and decision. Draw lessons from the British public legal service system to strengthen the link between the supporting prosecution system and other systems, enhance the parties to the choice of dispute resolution, so that the system of supporting prosecution can be more convenient.
【学位授予单位】：西北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.1

【参考文献】