论从宽处理的三种模式

发布时间：2018-10-08 09:01

【摘要】：规范严谨的从宽处理体系是维持认罪认罚从宽制度适用合法性的基础条件之一。解读域外代表性国家的认罪案件从宽处罚规范,可分为美国的"无限制模式"和英国、德国的"比例模式",不同模式的界分与该国认罪案件快速处理程序的多样性特点紧密相连。在对比和借鉴的基础上,我国未来改革宜建立从宽处理的混合体系模式,以配合多元化繁简分流机制的适用,满足刑事司法领域优化职权配置、减轻办案负担的迫切需要。改革方案应当适当丰富从宽处罚的内涵与类型,在科学地设计从宽比例及其限度的同时,规范检察权与审判权在刑罚从宽自由裁量方面的互动影响,突显司法审查与监督的关键作用,平衡控辩双方和被害人等主体的权利义务及其参与关系,既需调动认罪积极性又应保障刑罚威慑力。
[Abstract]:The standardized and strict leniency system is one of the basic conditions to maintain the legality of the leniency system. The interpretation of the lenient punishment norms in cases of plea of guilt in overseas representative countries can be divided into the "unlimited mode" of the United States and the United Kingdom. The scale model of Germany, the demarcation of different models is closely related to the diversity of the country's rapid processing of plea cases. On the basis of comparison and reference, we should establish a mixed system model of lenient treatment in the future reform in order to meet the urgent need of optimizing power allocation in criminal justice field and lightening the burden of handling cases. The reform plan should appropriately enrich the connotation and types of lenient punishment, while scientifically designing leniency ratio and its limits, and standardizing the interactive influence of procuratorial power and judicial power in the aspect of penalty leniency and discretion. To highlight the key role of judicial review and supervision, to balance the rights and obligations of the subjects, such as prosecution and defense and victims, as well as their participation relations, we should not only mobilize the enthusiasm of guilty pleas but also guarantee the deterrent power of punishment.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学法学院;
【基金】：中国人民大学2016年度拔尖创新人才培育资助计划
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】