检察机关适用违法所得特别没收程序的思考
发布时间：2018-10-08 17:51
【摘要】：修改后的刑事诉讼法增加了犯罪嫌疑人、被告人逃匿、死亡案件违法所得的特别没收程序。启动违法所得特别没收程序必须在犯罪类型、犯罪人状态、可供没收的财产等方面具备一定的条件,以及其他程序性条件。与其他刑事诉讼程序不同,违法所得特别没收程序适用的是民事诉讼的"优势证据标准",证明责任也是适用"谁主张,谁举证"的均衡原则,诉讼双方都承担举证责任。检察机关在提出没收财产申请时,应当从犯罪证据、涉案财产证据、司法程序证据等方面提供证据材料。为更好地履行违法所得特别没收程序中的检察职能,检察机关要着重增强追赃意识、人权保护意识、法律监督意识和国际合作意识。
[Abstract]:The revised Code of Criminal procedure adds special confiscation procedures for criminal suspects, defendants, and illegal income in death cases. The special confiscation procedure of illegal gains must have certain conditions in terms of the type of crime, the state of the offender and the property available for confiscation, as well as other procedural conditions. Different from other criminal proceedings, the special confiscation procedure of illegal income applies the "superior evidence standard" in civil proceedings, and the burden of proof is also the balanced principle of "who claims, who proves", and both parties bear the burden of proof. When applying for confiscation of property, the procuratorial organ shall provide evidence materials from the aspects of evidence of crime, evidence of property involved in the case, evidence of judicial procedure, etc. In order to better perform the procuratorial function in the procedure of special confiscation of illegal gains, the procuratorial organs should focus on strengthening the consciousness of chasing stolen goods, protecting human rights, legal supervision and international cooperation.
【作者单位】： 最高人民检察院反贪污贿赂总局;
【分类号】：D925.2;D926.3
[Abstract]:The revised Code of Criminal procedure adds special confiscation procedures for criminal suspects, defendants, and illegal income in death cases. The special confiscation procedure of illegal gains must have certain conditions in terms of the type of crime, the state of the offender and the property available for confiscation, as well as other procedural conditions. Different from other criminal proceedings, the special confiscation procedure of illegal income applies the "superior evidence standard" in civil proceedings, and the burden of proof is also the balanced principle of "who claims, who proves", and both parties bear the burden of proof. When applying for confiscation of property, the procuratorial organ shall provide evidence materials from the aspects of evidence of crime, evidence of property involved in the case, evidence of judicial procedure, etc. In order to better perform the procuratorial function in the procedure of special confiscation of illegal gains, the procuratorial organs should focus on strengthening the consciousness of chasing stolen goods, protecting human rights, legal supervision and international cooperation.
【作者单位】： 最高人民检察院反贪污贿赂总局;
【分类号】：D925.2;D926.3
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 孙颖;郭小锋;;初查涉案款物的类型及其处理[J];人民检察;2010年21期
2 曾国勇;;职务犯罪侦查程序中犯罪嫌疑人人权保障探析[J];法学杂志;2011年06期
3 杨泽璇;;引入资格管理制度预防职务犯罪[J];人民检察;2007年14期
4 赖彩明;;法律应明确检察机关对违法所得的处理权[J];人民检察;2008年12期
5 李增鹏;;检察机关扣押、冻结、处理涉案款物的制度完善[J];民营科技;2010年10期
6 王s，
本文编号：2257711
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2257711.html
