纪检监察证据转化刑事证据研究

发布时间：2018-10-10 13:01

【摘要】：纪检监察机关是我国反腐败机构之一,在反腐体系中处于领导核心地位。无论是违纪还是违法,都需要证据,证据是证实一切违法违纪的强力武器。纪检监察证据就是违纪证据,刑事证据就是违法证据,分别根据纪检监察机关和检察机关的不同职能采取不同收集方式收集证据。在当前反腐败斗争新的大形势下,随着纪检监察机关与检察机关办案协作机制的不断健全和完善,经常相互移交证据,在检察机关移交给纪检监察机关案件来说,针对司法机关移送的案件材料和证据材料,纪检监察机关几乎予以采信,不存在证据转化问题。然而,纪检监察机关移交检察机关案件材料和证据材料,却无法顺利转化为刑事证据,而是经过多重的鉴别和区分才可以转化。几年来,专家学者都在研究纪检证据如何转化为刑事证据,最终都没有结果。无法顺利转化证据的原因正是法律对刑事证据规定更为严格规范,法律的权威性任何人均无法超越。由于纪检监察机关不是法律规定的取证主体,受到法律法规的制约,纪检证据无法顺利转化为刑事证据。本文继续对证据转化中出现的问题进行探讨。本文第一部分首先对纪检监察证据进行论述。该部分包括纪检监察证据的概念、内容及其形式。同时论述刑事证据的概念、内容及其形式,以及与纪检监察证据的区别;第二部分主要是个人对纪检监察证据转化刑事证据的必要性与可行性进行分析。该部分包括纪检监察证据在司法活动中起到的重要作用,并通过反向思维证实纪检监察证据转化刑事证据的必要性,以及现今我国对监察制度的改革试点进一步推动了纪检监察证据转化刑事证据的进程。这是本文的重点之一。第三部分对纪检监察证据转化为刑事诉讼证据的现状及原因分析。该部分主要是证明纪检监察证据转化为刑事证据的困难性,和刑事证据主要在实物证据和言词证据、鉴定结论转寻找突破口。第四部分主要研究纪检监察证据转化刑事证据存在问题的对策。该部分主要纪检监察证据和刑事证据之间的转化所需的对策。同时可参照港澳的做法,完善我国国内证据能力的不足。
[Abstract]:Discipline inspection and supervision organ is one of the anti-corruption organizations in our country, and is in the leading core position in the anti-corruption system. Evidence is needed, both in violation of discipline and in violation of discipline. Evidence is a powerful weapon to prove any violation of discipline. Discipline inspection evidence is evidence of violation of discipline, criminal evidence is illegal evidence, according to the different functions of discipline inspection and supervision organs and procuratorial organs to collect evidence in different ways. Under the new general situation of the current anti-corruption struggle, with the continuous improvement and perfection of the cooperation mechanism between discipline inspection and procuratorial organs in handling cases, evidence is often handed over to each other. In the case of procuratorial organs transferred to discipline inspection and supervision organs, According to the case materials and evidence materials transferred by the judicial organs, discipline inspection and supervision organs almost accept the information, and there is no question of evidence conversion. However, the documents and evidence materials transferred by discipline inspection and supervision organs to procuratorial organs cannot be transformed into criminal evidence smoothly, but can only be transformed through multiple discriminations and distinctions. For several years, experts and scholars have been studying how disciplinary evidence can be transformed into criminal evidence. The reason why the evidence can not be transformed smoothly is that the law prescribes more strict norms of criminal evidence, and no one can surpass the authority of the law. As discipline inspection and supervision organ is not the subject of evidence collection stipulated by law and restricted by laws and regulations, discipline inspection evidence can not be transformed into criminal evidence smoothly. This article continues to discuss the problems in the conversion of evidence. The first part of this paper discusses the evidence of discipline inspection and supervision. This part includes the concept, content and form of discipline inspection and supervision evidence. At the same time, it discusses the concept, content and form of criminal evidence, as well as the difference between criminal evidence and discipline inspection evidence. The second part mainly analyzes the necessity and feasibility of the transformation of discipline inspection and supervision evidence into criminal evidence. This part includes the important role that discipline inspection and supervision evidence plays in judicial activities, and proves the necessity of transforming discipline inspection and supervision evidence into criminal evidence through reverse thinking. And the reform of supervision system in our country has further promoted the process of transforming discipline inspection and supervision evidence into criminal evidence. This is one of the key points of this paper. The third part analyzes the current situation and reasons of the transformation of disciplinary inspection evidence into criminal procedure evidence. This part is mainly to prove the difficulty of transforming discipline inspection and supervision evidence into criminal evidence, and the criminal evidence mainly lies in physical evidence and verbal evidence. The fourth part mainly studies the countermeasures of the problems existing in the transformation of discipline inspection and supervision evidence into criminal evidence. This part mainly inspects and supervises the evidence and the criminal evidence transformation needs the countermeasure. At the same time, we can refer to the practice of Hong Kong and Macao to improve our domestic evidentiary capacity.
【学位授予单位】：广西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】