刑事强制医疗制度的世界经验与中国模式
发布时间：2018-10-16 14:33
【摘要】：刑事强制医疗制度自2012年《刑事诉讼法》修改后确立以来一直是理论界与实务界讨论的热点话题。尽管制度的具体化使精神病人强制医疗有了可依赖的法律基础,但目前法律规定的模糊给实际执行带来了诸多阻碍。不仅如此,无论是在立法层面抑或是司法层面,我国对精神病人诉讼权利的保护都仍显不足。相比之下,域外国家和地区在强制医疗程序立法方面有着相对丰富的经验,程序亦相对完备,无论是实体条件还是程序条件的规定,均有值得我们思考与借鉴之处。对此,结合我国目前刑事强制医疗制度中存在的问题,尝试构建一个较为适当的刑事强制医疗制度中国模式,不仅有利于促进该制度立法层面的完善,也有利于司法的健康运行和对精神病人诉讼权益的保护。
[Abstract]:Since the establishment of the Criminal procedure Law in 2012, the criminal compulsory medical system has been a hot topic in the theoretical and practical circles. Although the concretization of the system makes the compulsory medical treatment of mental patients have a dependable legal basis, the ambiguity of the current legal provisions has brought many obstacles to the actual implementation. Not only that, whether in the legislative level or the judicial level, the protection of the litigation rights of mental patients in China is still insufficient. In contrast, foreign countries and regions have relatively rich experience in the legislation of compulsory medical procedures, and the procedures are relatively complete. Both substantive and procedural conditions are worthy of our consideration and reference. In view of this, combined with the existing problems in our country's current criminal compulsory medical treatment system, we try to construct a more appropriate Chinese model of the criminal compulsory medical care system, which is not only conducive to the improvement of the system's legislative level. It is also conducive to the healthy operation of the judiciary and the protection of the rights and interests of mental patients.
【作者单位】： 海南大学法学院;
【基金】：海南大学与普通高校人文社科重点研究基地中国政法大学诉讼法学研究院合作项目(HD-KYH-2011-025)
【分类号】：D925.2
本文编号：2274666
[Abstract]:Since the establishment of the Criminal procedure Law in 2012, the criminal compulsory medical system has been a hot topic in the theoretical and practical circles. Although the concretization of the system makes the compulsory medical treatment of mental patients have a dependable legal basis, the ambiguity of the current legal provisions has brought many obstacles to the actual implementation. Not only that, whether in the legislative level or the judicial level, the protection of the litigation rights of mental patients in China is still insufficient. In contrast, foreign countries and regions have relatively rich experience in the legislation of compulsory medical procedures, and the procedures are relatively complete. Both substantive and procedural conditions are worthy of our consideration and reference. In view of this, combined with the existing problems in our country's current criminal compulsory medical treatment system, we try to construct a more appropriate Chinese model of the criminal compulsory medical care system, which is not only conducive to the improvement of the system's legislative level. It is also conducive to the healthy operation of the judiciary and the protection of the rights and interests of mental patients.
【作者单位】： 海南大学法学院;
【基金】：海南大学与普通高校人文社科重点研究基地中国政法大学诉讼法学研究院合作项目(HD-KYH-2011-025)
【分类号】：D925.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 张金明;;浅谈刑事强制医疗制度的完善[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2014年04期
2 ;[J];;年期
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 江苏省泰州市人民检察院 王洪坤 叶晓燕;从三方面保障强制医疗制度[N];检察日报;2013年
2 李微;强制医疗：有待严密的程序规制[N];检察日报;2004年
相关硕士学位论文 前9条
1 马慧宇;刑事强制医疗制度研究[D];内蒙古大学;2015年
2 陈斯振;我国刑事强制医疗制度的不足与完善[D];江西财经大学;2016年
3 韦祝瑜;我国刑事强制医疗制度研究[D];广西师范大学;2014年
4 张鹏;论我国刑事强制医疗制度的完善[D];辽宁大学;2013年
5 杨有鹏;我国强制医疗制度的法律分析[D];兰州大学;2015年
6 孙娜;刑事强制医疗制度研究[D];甘肃政法学院;2014年
7 赵会君;刑事强制医疗制度研究[D];天津师范大学;2015年
8 傅征宇;我国强制医疗的困境与出路[D];西南政法大学;2014年
9 陈慧;我国刑事强制医疗制度问题研究[D];安徽财经大学;2015年
，本文编号：2274666
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2274666.html
