论我国小小额诉讼程序的完善

发布时间：2018-10-16 14:43

【摘要】：新民诉法在2012年第一次对我国小额诉讼程序进行了规定,该条款是我国立法上的突破,对于迅速解决纠纷、实现司法大众化提供了重要的法律依据、起到了重要作用,但是因仅有一条,所以对小额诉讼程序的规定存在不足,且造成司法不统一的现象。为此,最高人民法院出台了司法解释对小额诉讼程序进行了细化规定,从而指导我国小额诉讼程序在司法实践中的运用。这一解释使小额诉讼程序在司法适用中更加具有操作性、可行性,进步之处显而易见,但仍存在一些不足之处,包括小额诉讼程序的价值取向、立法模式、程序选择权、审理程序和救济程序等方面。这些不足使得在司法实践中运用该程序处理相关案件时,遇到了不少的困难和障碍。因此,在研究其他国家和地区的小额诉讼程序基础上,提出完善我国小额诉讼程序的措施,成为当务之急。本文首先从小额诉讼程序的特征和价值,以及其与简易程序的比较,这两个方面入手,对小额诉讼程序进行了简要的分析;其次,分析我国小额诉讼程序的现状;再次,从比较法角度出发,分析其他国家和地区的小额诉讼程序,主要从小额诉讼程序的立法模式、适用范围、启动、审理和执行程序等方面进行阐述;最后,主要从立法模式、启动、审理程序、救济程序、执行程序等方面,提出完善小额诉讼程序的建议,以期为我国小额诉讼程序的发展贡献力量。
[Abstract]:In 2012, the New Civil Action Law provided for the small claims procedure for the first time in our country, which is a breakthrough in the legislation of our country. It has provided an important legal basis for the rapid resolution of disputes and the realization of judicial popularization, and has played an important role. However, there is only one, so the provisions of small claims procedure are inadequate, and cause the phenomenon of judicial disunity. Therefore, the Supreme people's Court has issued a judicial interpretation of the small claims procedure detailed provisions, so as to guide the application of our small claims procedure in judicial practice. This explanation makes the small claims procedure more operable, feasible and progressive, but there are still some shortcomings, including the value orientation of the small claims procedure, the legislative model, the choice of procedure. Trial procedure, relief procedure, etc. These deficiencies make the use of this procedure in judicial practice to deal with related cases, encountered a lot of difficulties and obstacles. Therefore, on the basis of studying the small claims procedure in other countries and regions, it is urgent to put forward the measures to perfect the small claims procedure in our country. In this paper, the characteristics and value of the small claims procedure, and its comparison with the summary procedure, start with a brief analysis of the small claims procedure; secondly, the analysis of the status quo of the small claims procedure in China; again, From the perspective of comparative law, this paper analyzes the small claims procedure in other countries and regions, mainly from the aspects of legislative model, scope of application, initiation, trial and execution of small claims procedure. In order to contribute to the development of the small claims procedure in our country, the author puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the small claims procedure in the aspects of starting, trial procedure, relief procedure, execution procedure and so on.
【学位授予单位】：青岛大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】