再论督促程序电子化改革的重点
发布时间：2018-10-18 18:18
【摘要】：在我国法院"案多人少"的压力日渐突出的背景下,应当尽快进行督促程序电子化改革,以减轻法院负担和实现诉讼效率。为此,未来尤其应当注意在诉讼系属、时效中断、管辖、保全、费用承担等议题上为督促程序的申请人提供与普通诉讼程序相同乃至更优的保护。同时,在取消法院对支付令申请进行实质审查之后,还有必要通过限制金钱债权数额和限定违俗债权之适用等途径防止债权人滥用督促程序骗取支付令。为了防止债务人滥用异议,未来也有必要要求债务人的异议包含答辩的内容,以及允许当事人约定"败诉当事人承担对方当事人的律师费用"等条款。此外,还可通过命令申请人补充说明事实、予以罚款、不适用时效中断规定、允许被告提起损害赔偿之诉和再审之诉等途径促进当事人履行真实完整与诚实信用义务。总体而言,督促程序不是非讼程序,其作为简便、快捷和不经对审即可创设执行名义的略式程序,与后续的诉讼程序构成一个程序,债务人提起异议的效力就在于将单方程序转化为对审程序,并发生追溯既往的效力。
[Abstract]:Under the background of the pressure of "more cases with fewer people" in our court, we should carry out the electronic reform of supervision procedure as soon as possible in order to lighten the burden of the court and realize the efficiency of litigation. Therefore, in the future, we should pay special attention to provide the same or better protection to the applicant in the supervision procedure on the subject of limitation interruption, jurisdiction, preservation, cost bearing and so on. At the same time, it is necessary to prevent creditors from abusing the supervision procedure to defraud payment orders by restricting the amount of money claims and limiting the application of unconventional claims after canceling the court's substantive examination of the application of payment orders. In order to prevent the debtor from abusing dissent, it is also necessary to require the debtor's dissent to include the contents of defense and to allow the parties to agree that "the losing party shall bear the lawyer's expenses of the other party". In addition, by ordering the applicant to explain the facts, imposing a fine, not applying the limitation interruption rule, and allowing the defendant to file a suit for damages and a retrial, the parties may be promoted to fulfill their obligations of truthfulness, integrity and good faith. Generally speaking, the supervisory procedure is not a non-litigation procedure, but as a simple, quick and untried procedure in the name of execution, constituting a procedure with subsequent proceedings, The effect of the debtor's objection is to convert the unilateral proceedings into the trial proceedings and take effect retroactively.
【作者单位】： 2011计划司法文明协同创新中心;浙江大学光华法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金一般项目(16BFX094)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D925.1
本文编号：2279977
[Abstract]:Under the background of the pressure of "more cases with fewer people" in our court, we should carry out the electronic reform of supervision procedure as soon as possible in order to lighten the burden of the court and realize the efficiency of litigation. Therefore, in the future, we should pay special attention to provide the same or better protection to the applicant in the supervision procedure on the subject of limitation interruption, jurisdiction, preservation, cost bearing and so on. At the same time, it is necessary to prevent creditors from abusing the supervision procedure to defraud payment orders by restricting the amount of money claims and limiting the application of unconventional claims after canceling the court's substantive examination of the application of payment orders. In order to prevent the debtor from abusing dissent, it is also necessary to require the debtor's dissent to include the contents of defense and to allow the parties to agree that "the losing party shall bear the lawyer's expenses of the other party". In addition, by ordering the applicant to explain the facts, imposing a fine, not applying the limitation interruption rule, and allowing the defendant to file a suit for damages and a retrial, the parties may be promoted to fulfill their obligations of truthfulness, integrity and good faith. Generally speaking, the supervisory procedure is not a non-litigation procedure, but as a simple, quick and untried procedure in the name of execution, constituting a procedure with subsequent proceedings, The effect of the debtor's objection is to convert the unilateral proceedings into the trial proceedings and take effect retroactively.
【作者单位】： 2011计划司法文明协同创新中心;浙江大学光华法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金一般项目(16BFX094)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D925.1
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前5条
1 马锁文;诉讼时效中断事由探析[J];中州学刊;2000年06期
2 严凌振;;从一起二审改判案谈海事诉讼中的时效中断[J];中国海商法年刊;2008年00期
3 杨光;;论仲裁时效中断的事由[J];广州大学学报(社会科学版);2010年08期
4 葛银慧;;浅议我国行政诉讼应设立时效中断制度[J];法制与社会;2013年10期
5 ;[J];;年期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 刘晓鹏;诉讼时效中断如何认定[N];江苏农业科技报;2008年
，本文编号：2279977
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2279977.html
