刑事速裁程序试点实效检验——基于12666份速裁案件裁判文书的实证分析

发布时间：2018-10-18 19:38

【摘要】：2014年6月,全国人大常委会授权最高人民法院、最高人民检察院在全国18个城市进行刑事案件速裁程序试点。根据对12666份速裁案件裁判文书样本的分析,虽然速裁案件的审判效率有显著提高,但审前效率的提高并不显著;速裁案件量刑在有期徒刑、拘役的裁量上基本保持均衡,但在缓刑的适用上存在犯罪类别之间、试点城市之间的较大偏差;速裁程序试点中虽然建立了值班律师制度,但被告人聘请律师辩护的比例很低。基于上述检验结果,未来速裁程序立法要加快案件的审前流程,特别是要在提高取保候审和监视居住适用率的基础上,缩短取保候审和监视居住的法定期限;规范速裁案件量刑指南,避免量刑在区域之间、犯罪类别之间的严重偏差;在完善值班律师制度的基础上,可考虑实现速裁案件的强制性律师辩护,保障被告人的辩护权。
[Abstract]:In June 2014, the standing Committee of the National people's Congress authorized the Supreme people's Court and the Supreme people's Procuratorate to pilot criminal cases in 18 cities. According to the analysis of 12666 samples of adjudicative documents of quick adjudication cases, although the trial efficiency of quick adjudication cases has significantly improved, the improvement of pre-trial efficiency is not significant. The sentencing of speedy adjudication cases is basically balanced in terms of prison terms and the discretion of criminal detention. However, in the application of probation, there is a big deviation between the types of crimes and between the pilot cities; although the system of duty lawyer has been set up in the trial of quick adjudication procedure, the proportion of defendants who employ lawyers to defend them is very low. Based on the above test results, the future legislation of expedited adjudication procedure should speed up the pretrial process of cases, especially on the basis of improving the applicable rate of obtaining bail pending trial and monitoring residence, and shortening the legal period of bail pending trial and residential surveillance; On the basis of perfecting the system of duty lawyer, we can consider to realize the compulsory defense of the judge case and protect the defendant's right of defense by standardizing the sentencing guide of the quick adjudication case and avoiding the serious deviation of the sentencing between the regions and the types of the crime, and on the basis of perfecting the system of the lawyer on duty.
【作者单位】：中国政法大学诉讼法学研究院;
【基金】：作者主持的北京市社会科学基金重点项目“刑事速裁程序研究”(16FXA007)的阶段性成果国家2011计划司法文明协同创新中心的研究成果
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】