民事电子数据的证据交换制度研究
发布时间：2018-10-22 07:00
【摘要】：伴随着网络技术的飞速发展,电子邮箱、手机短信、电子商务等信息交流手段已经势不可挡地进入我们的日常生活中,并对我们的生活产生了重大的影响。电子数据作为证据的一种类型被写入2012年修订后的民事诉讼法中,这是我国民事诉讼法学的一大进步,为我们将来解决信息化程度不断升级的案件提供了重要的基础保障。但是我国相关立法中关于电子数据的配套规定却寥寥无几,对于其适用规则、技术方面的规定还远远达不到英美国家的水平,这必然增加了民事审判程序正常进行的难度,导致了民事诉讼中证据交换无法及时进行,大大降低了司法权威性,妨碍了民事诉讼追求效率的价值要求。鉴于此,有必要对民事诉讼电子数据证据交换制度进行理论研究,为立法和司法提供相应的理论依据。本文从电子数据证据交换制度的概念入手,对两大法系电子数据证据交换制度进行比较研究,在对我国电子数据证据交换制度的现状进行分析的基础上,提出了完善我国电子数据证据交换制度的建议,以期对我国民事电子数据证据交换制度的体系建设有所裨益。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of network technology, electronic mail, mobile phone SMS, electronic commerce and other means of information exchange has been irresistible into our daily life, and has had a significant impact on our lives. Electronic data, as a type of evidence, is written into the revised civil procedure law in 2012, which is a great progress of civil procedural law in our country, and provides an important basic guarantee for us to solve the continuously upgraded cases of informationization in the future. However, there are very few supporting provisions on electronic data in the relevant legislation of our country. For the applicable rules, the technical provisions are still far from the level of the Anglo-American countries, which will inevitably increase the difficulty of the normal conduct of the civil trial procedure. As a result, the exchange of evidence in civil proceedings cannot be carried out in time, which greatly reduces the judicial authority and hinders the value requirement of efficiency in civil litigation. In view of this, it is necessary to carry on the theoretical research on the electronic data evidence exchange system in civil litigation, to provide the corresponding theoretical basis for the legislation and the judicature. Starting with the concept of electronic data evidence exchange system, this paper makes a comparative study on the electronic data evidence exchange system in two legal systems, and analyzes the present situation of electronic data evidence exchange system in China. The paper puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the electronic data evidence exchange system in order to benefit the system construction of the civil electronic data evidence exchange system in China.
【学位授予单位】：内蒙古大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.13
本文编号：2286440
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of network technology, electronic mail, mobile phone SMS, electronic commerce and other means of information exchange has been irresistible into our daily life, and has had a significant impact on our lives. Electronic data, as a type of evidence, is written into the revised civil procedure law in 2012, which is a great progress of civil procedural law in our country, and provides an important basic guarantee for us to solve the continuously upgraded cases of informationization in the future. However, there are very few supporting provisions on electronic data in the relevant legislation of our country. For the applicable rules, the technical provisions are still far from the level of the Anglo-American countries, which will inevitably increase the difficulty of the normal conduct of the civil trial procedure. As a result, the exchange of evidence in civil proceedings cannot be carried out in time, which greatly reduces the judicial authority and hinders the value requirement of efficiency in civil litigation. In view of this, it is necessary to carry on the theoretical research on the electronic data evidence exchange system in civil litigation, to provide the corresponding theoretical basis for the legislation and the judicature. Starting with the concept of electronic data evidence exchange system, this paper makes a comparative study on the electronic data evidence exchange system in two legal systems, and analyzes the present situation of electronic data evidence exchange system in China. The paper puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the electronic data evidence exchange system in order to benefit the system construction of the civil electronic data evidence exchange system in China.
【学位授予单位】：内蒙古大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.13
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 乔雄兵;;美国电子证据开示变革及对我国的启示[J];北京理工大学学报(社会科学版);2012年01期
2 刁胜先;李艳;;论电子认证的法律关系[J];重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版);2010年06期
3 汤维建;民事诉讼中证据交换制度的确立和完善[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;2004年01期
4 杜闻;;英美民事证据开示若干问题研析[J];证据科学;2008年06期
5 刘方权;;技术与法律双重视野下的电子证据搜查扣押——以“肉食者”系统引发的争议为例[J];证据科学;2010年01期
6 汤维建,陈巍;《关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》的创新与不足[J];法商研究;2005年03期
7 陈桂明,纪格非;美国证据法中的保密特权原则及其对我国证据立法的启示[J];法学评论;2002年02期
8 周彦;;论电子证据的法律定位[J];法制与社会;2010年12期
9 李扬;;论电子证据在我国新修《民事诉讼法》中的法律地位[J];重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版);2012年06期
10 徐广芹;;浅议新证据类型电子数据的内涵与认定[J];北方文学(下旬);2012年11期
，本文编号：2286440
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2286440.html
