我国行政诉讼审判监督程序研究
发布时间：2018-10-26 13:31
【摘要】：行政诉讼审判监督程序是针对生效裁判所适用的一种特殊法律救济程序,正是因为具有的补救价值,其在诉讼程序中有着十分重要的地位。审判监督程序的完善,有利于保障当事人的诉权,维护其合法权利,有利于裁判的公正性和正确性。但是长期以来,由于行政诉讼法规定的审判监督程序过于简略,以及缺乏有效的再审程序配套机制,司法实践中出现了再审申诉率居高不下、当事人申请再审权难以实现等问题。因此,笔者认为应当从立法上完善行政诉讼再审程序,构建再审程序的相关配套机制,提高审判质量,以诉权形式保证当事人合理再审需求,控制申诉泛滥,树立司法权威,实现提起再审的方式从职权主义向当事人主义的转变。只有这样,才能从根本上解决目前我国行政诉讼审判监督程序面临的困境。本文对我国行政诉讼审判监督程序的探讨和研究,不再局限于扩大再审事由的范围、放宽再审准入条件方面等内容,而是从理论与实践的两个角度出发展开分析,针对我国行政诉讼审判监督程序在立法上之不足,结合民事诉讼审判监督程序和域外的成熟经验,提出完善行政诉讼审判监督程序制度设定和保障机制的构想。本文主要分为六章。第一章为引言,介绍了论文选题背景、选题意义、研究方法、国内外研究现状等问题。第二章为行政诉讼审判监督程序概述,对审判监督程序进行概念界定,介绍审判监督程序的理论基础,梳理我国行政诉讼审判监督程序的发展过程,分析其与民事诉讼审判监督程序的关系和区别。第三章为域相关制度的介绍与评价,着重阐述了域外立法对我国的启示与借鉴。第四章从立法和实践两个方面对我国行政诉讼审判监督程序的现状进行论述,并对其的不足进行反思。第五章为我国行政诉讼审判监督程序的完善,根据第四章的论述,提出具体举措和配套机制的完善对策。第六章为结论。
[Abstract]:The procedure of judicial supervision in administrative litigation is a special kind of legal relief procedure applied to the effective judgment. It is precisely because of its remedial value that it plays a very important role in the proceedings. The perfection of the procedure of trial supervision is conducive to the protection of the litigant's right of action, the protection of its legal right and the justice and correctness of the judge. However, for a long time, because the procedure of trial supervision stipulated in the Administrative procedure Law is too simple, and because of the lack of effective supporting mechanism of retrial procedure, the appeal rate of retrial appears to be high in judicial practice. The parties' right to apply for retrial is difficult to realize. Therefore, the author thinks that we should perfect the procedure of administrative litigation retrial in legislation, construct the relevant supporting mechanism of retrial procedure, improve the quality of trial, guarantee the reasonable retrial demand of the litigant in the form of right of action, control the overflow of complaints, and establish judicial authority. The way of bringing retrial is changed from authority doctrine to party doctrine. Only in this way, can we fundamentally solve the dilemma that our administrative litigation trial supervision procedure faces. In this paper, the discussion and research on the procedure of judicial supervision in administrative litigation in our country is no longer limited to expanding the scope of the cause of retrial and relaxing the conditions of admission of retrial, but is analyzed from the two angles of theory and practice. In view of the lack of legislation on the procedure of judicial supervision in administrative litigation in our country, combined with the trial supervision procedure of civil litigation and the mature experience of foreign countries, this paper puts forward the idea of perfecting the system of judicial supervision procedure and the guarantee mechanism of administrative litigation. This paper is divided into six chapters. The first chapter is the introduction, which introduces the background, significance, research methods and current research situation of the thesis. The second chapter is an overview of the procedure of trial supervision in administrative litigation. It defines the concept of the procedure of trial supervision, introduces the theoretical basis of the procedure of trial supervision, and combs the development process of the procedure of judicial supervision in administrative litigation of our country. This paper analyzes the relationship and difference between it and the procedure of trial supervision in civil litigation. The third chapter is the introduction and evaluation of the relevant systems, focusing on the enlightenment and reference of foreign legislation to our country. The fourth chapter discusses the current situation of our country's administrative litigation trial supervision procedure from the two aspects of legislation and practice, and reflects on its deficiency. The fifth chapter is the perfection of our country's administrative litigation trial supervision procedure, according to the fourth chapter's discussion, puts forward the concrete measure and the supporting mechanism consummation countermeasure. Chapter six is the conclusion.
【学位授予单位】：电子科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.3
本文编号：2295874
[Abstract]:The procedure of judicial supervision in administrative litigation is a special kind of legal relief procedure applied to the effective judgment. It is precisely because of its remedial value that it plays a very important role in the proceedings. The perfection of the procedure of trial supervision is conducive to the protection of the litigant's right of action, the protection of its legal right and the justice and correctness of the judge. However, for a long time, because the procedure of trial supervision stipulated in the Administrative procedure Law is too simple, and because of the lack of effective supporting mechanism of retrial procedure, the appeal rate of retrial appears to be high in judicial practice. The parties' right to apply for retrial is difficult to realize. Therefore, the author thinks that we should perfect the procedure of administrative litigation retrial in legislation, construct the relevant supporting mechanism of retrial procedure, improve the quality of trial, guarantee the reasonable retrial demand of the litigant in the form of right of action, control the overflow of complaints, and establish judicial authority. The way of bringing retrial is changed from authority doctrine to party doctrine. Only in this way, can we fundamentally solve the dilemma that our administrative litigation trial supervision procedure faces. In this paper, the discussion and research on the procedure of judicial supervision in administrative litigation in our country is no longer limited to expanding the scope of the cause of retrial and relaxing the conditions of admission of retrial, but is analyzed from the two angles of theory and practice. In view of the lack of legislation on the procedure of judicial supervision in administrative litigation in our country, combined with the trial supervision procedure of civil litigation and the mature experience of foreign countries, this paper puts forward the idea of perfecting the system of judicial supervision procedure and the guarantee mechanism of administrative litigation. This paper is divided into six chapters. The first chapter is the introduction, which introduces the background, significance, research methods and current research situation of the thesis. The second chapter is an overview of the procedure of trial supervision in administrative litigation. It defines the concept of the procedure of trial supervision, introduces the theoretical basis of the procedure of trial supervision, and combs the development process of the procedure of judicial supervision in administrative litigation of our country. This paper analyzes the relationship and difference between it and the procedure of trial supervision in civil litigation. The third chapter is the introduction and evaluation of the relevant systems, focusing on the enlightenment and reference of foreign legislation to our country. The fourth chapter discusses the current situation of our country's administrative litigation trial supervision procedure from the two aspects of legislation and practice, and reflects on its deficiency. The fifth chapter is the perfection of our country's administrative litigation trial supervision procedure, according to the fourth chapter's discussion, puts forward the concrete measure and the supporting mechanism consummation countermeasure. Chapter six is the conclusion.
【学位授予单位】：电子科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王亚新;;民事再审:程序的发展及其解释适用[J];北方法学;2016年05期
2 王宇坤;;刑事再审功能定位的理论反思——从“纠错型再审”到“救济型再审”的转型[J];华中师范大学研究生学报;2016年02期
3 刘欣琦;;新《行政诉讼法》实施后重作判决适用探析[J];政治与法律;2016年05期
4 雷澳星;;程序正义,司法公正的最后一道防线[J];法制与社会;2016年04期
5 罗骞;;新行政诉讼法适用的可预见问题及完善建议[J];法制与经济;2016年01期
6 王万华;;新行政诉讼法中“行政行为”辨析——兼论我国应加快制定行政程序法[J];国家检察官学院学报;2015年04期
7 韦炜;周游;;新行政诉讼法适用中的六大问题[J];人民司法;2015年03期
8 王晴晴;;论审判监督程序的完善[J];法制与社会;2014年17期
9 张嘉;;审判监督程序的弊端及完善[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2013年10期
10 吴卫军;汤湘燕;;行政指导之司法审查透析[J];电子科技大学学报( 社科版);2013年04期
相关硕士学位论文 前7条
1 李平;以法官中立性看程序正义的实现[D];西南政法大学;2015年
2 钱兆宁;英国刑事案件审查委员会再审审查程序研究[D];苏州大学;2014年
3 丁明珠;南京国民政府时期《行政诉讼法》文本研究[D];西南政法大学;2014年
4 刘新星;再审程序构造研究[D];西南政法大学;2011年
5 邵军;行政诉讼判决的既判力研究[D];浙江工商大学;2008年
6 耿春霞;对我国再审程序的反思与重构[D];河北大学;2007年
7 李小霞;行政判决既判力研究[D];西南政法大学;2006年
，本文编号：2295874
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2295874.html
