第三人撤销诉讼实益研究——以判决效力主观范围为视角

发布时间：2018-10-26 22:04

【摘要】：对于"我国第三人撤销诉讼制度实益到底何在"这一问题,学界观点纷纭不一。按照传统的判决效力主观范围理论,不受前诉判决效力所及的第三人可依据既判力相对性原则另诉,并且部分受到前诉判决效力扩张的第三人可以再审,因而第三人撤销诉讼的实益较为稀薄。反之,如果基于一次解决纠纷的需求扩大受前诉判决效力拘束的第三人的范围,则第三人撤销诉讼可以为这些第三人提供程序保障;此外,允许不受前诉判决效力扩张的第三人提起本诉也有实际的便利。我国欠缺关于判决效力及其主观范围的明确规定,因此关于第三人撤销诉讼的实益的讨论并不同于域外。在现有的制度安排下,即使我国将来确立既判力相对性原则,第三人撤销诉讼制度仍然具备特有的实益。
[Abstract]:Scholars have different views on the question of "where is the benefit of the third party rescission litigation system in China?" According to the traditional theory of subjective scope of the validity of the judgment, the third party who is not subject to the validity of the judgment of the former suit may sue separately according to the principle of relativity of res judicata, and the third party who is partly expanded by the validity of the judgment of the former suit can be retried. As a result, the benefit of the third party to withdraw the action is relatively thin. On the contrary, if the scope of the third party who is bound by the validity of the pre-suit judgment is expanded on the basis of the need of resolving the dispute once, the third party can provide procedural protection for the third party to withdraw the lawsuit; In addition, it is also convenient to allow the third party who is not subject to the expansion of the pre-appeal judgment to file this suit. Our country lacks the explicit stipulation about the validity of judgment and its subjective scope, so the beneficial discussion about the third party rescission action is not the same as that outside the country. Under the present system arrangement, even if our country establishes the principle of the relativity of res judicata in the future, the third party revocation litigation system still has the unique beneficial effect.
【作者单位】：重庆大学法学院;
【基金】：重庆大学学院科技创新专项“公益诉讼当事人适格与判决效力扩张研究”(项目号106112016CDJSK080007) 2015年国家社科基金项目“民事事实认定权运行机制研究”(项目号15BFX037)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】