论民间规则进入民事司法渠道的一般条款——以“凶宅”案为例

发布时间：2018-10-31 14:19

【摘要】：民间规则是经验事实的规范表达,是"地方性知识",彰显实质正义。一般条款仅规定内容十分宽泛的价值指引,内涵与外延均不明确,但却包含事实构成与法律后果两部分。尽管一般条款与法律的明确性要求相悖,但选择一般条款纯属人类的无奈之举。人类理性的局限性,作为建构理性的制定法的滞后性与不周延性,而且,法律的普遍性从来就只不过是一种神话。为了克服制定法的局限性,达致普遍正义与特殊正义的平衡,法律不得不赋予法官自由裁量权,根据社会的发展变化,注入社会经验,从而变更和充实制定法的内容。因此,一般条款自然成为立法者的技术性选择。作为经验事实的民事规则能够让一般条款宽泛的价值具体化,使一般条款与案件事实对接起来。也正是在具体化过程中,民间规则进入民事司法。
[Abstract]:Folk rules are the normative expression of empirical facts and local knowledge, showing substantial justice. The general clause only provides the very broad content value guide, the connotation and the extension are not clear, but contains the fact constitution and the legal consequence two parts. Although the general clause is contrary to the explicit requirement of the law, the choice of the general clause is purely human helplessness. The limitation of human rationality is the lag and imperfection of establishing rational law, and the universality of law has never been more than a myth. In order to overcome the limitation of the law and achieve the balance between universal justice and special justice, the law has to give the judge the discretion to inject social experience according to the social development and change, so as to change and enrich the content of the law. Therefore, the general clause naturally becomes the legislator's technical choice. As an empirical fact, the civil rules can concretize the broad value of the general clause and link the general clause with the facts of the case. It is also in the concrete process, folk rules into civil justice.
【作者单位】：广东培正学院;
【基金】：广东省高校特色创新(人文社科类)项目(项目编号:2015WTSCX111) 2016年度广州市哲学社会科学发展“十三五”规划共建课题(项目编号:2016GZGJ47)资助
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】