民事诉讼当事人的真实义务及其法律后果
发布时间：2018-11-01 17:48
【摘要】：我国最新修改的《民事诉讼法》第13条，明确把诚实信用原则载入法条，这是我国民事诉讼法的一大进步。通常，诚实信用原则是真实义务的立法先导，因此，在我国明确诚实信用原则的今天讨论民事诉讼当事人真实义务及其法律后果，有其独特的现实意义。本文从真实义务的含义分析出发，对真实义务的定义内容意义等进行剖析，，再讨论真实义务的产生及其发展。进而探讨违反真实义务的主要表现形式以及违反真实义务所产生的公法私法两个方面的法律后果。最后对我国设置真实义务的必要性以及立法构建进行了研究。本文不仅从理论层面对民事诉讼当事人真实义务及其法律后果进行了系统的分析，而且对于真实义务制度构建的分析对我国司法实践也有一定的指导意义。
[Abstract]:Article 13 of our country's newly revised Civil procedure Law clearly enshrines the principle of good faith in the article, which is a great progress of our civil procedure law. Generally, the principle of good faith is the legislative guide of the true obligation. Therefore, it is of special practical significance to discuss the true obligation of the parties in civil litigation and its legal consequences in our country today when the principle of good faith is clear. This article starts from the meaning analysis of the real obligation, the definition of the real obligation? Content The significance of the analysis, and then discuss the emergence and development of real obligations. And then explore the main forms of breach of the obligation of truth and the public law arising from the breach of the obligation of truth? The legal consequences of two aspects of private law. Finally, the necessity of setting up the real obligation and the legislative construction are studied. This paper not only makes a systematic analysis of the parties' real obligations and their legal consequences from the theoretical level, but also has certain guiding significance to the judicial practice of our country.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.1
本文编号：2304646
[Abstract]:Article 13 of our country's newly revised Civil procedure Law clearly enshrines the principle of good faith in the article, which is a great progress of our civil procedure law. Generally, the principle of good faith is the legislative guide of the true obligation. Therefore, it is of special practical significance to discuss the true obligation of the parties in civil litigation and its legal consequences in our country today when the principle of good faith is clear. This article starts from the meaning analysis of the real obligation, the definition of the real obligation? Content The significance of the analysis, and then discuss the emergence and development of real obligations. And then explore the main forms of breach of the obligation of truth and the public law arising from the breach of the obligation of truth? The legal consequences of two aspects of private law. Finally, the necessity of setting up the real obligation and the legislative construction are studied. This paper not only makes a systematic analysis of the parties' real obligations and their legal consequences from the theoretical level, but also has certain guiding significance to the judicial practice of our country.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 柯阳友,吴英旗;民事诉讼当事人真实义务研究[J];北京科技大学学报(社会科学版);2005年03期
2 吴云;;论对我国民事诉讼中虚假陈述的法律规制[J];长春理工大学学报(社会科学版);2010年02期
3 陈雪萍;诚实信用原则与民事诉讼权利滥用之制约[J];当代法学;2002年08期
4 李尧;;浅论民事诉讼中的真实陈述义务[J];法制与社会;2007年10期
5 周鹏飞;;浅论真实义务在我国民事诉讼法上的确立[J];法制与社会;2013年28期
6 周成泓;;走向动态:民事诉讼当事人的具体化义务[J];华南农业大学学报(社会科学版);2010年02期
7 李伯安;;民事诉讼当事人真实义务法律化研究[J];暨南学报(哲学社会科学版);2011年04期
8 冯雅婧;杨涛;;试论民事诉讼当事人真实陈述义务[J];今日湖北(理论版);2007年03期
9 翁晓斌;职权探知主义转向辩论主义的思考[J];法学研究;2005年04期
本文编号：2304646
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2304646.html
