附条件不起诉制度比较研究
发布时间:2018-11-04 13:14
【摘要】:附条件不起诉制度作为一种裁量不起诉的表现形式,是恢复性司法在我国的有效运用,是起诉便宜主义和诉讼经济的产物,体现了非犯罪化、非刑罚化的思想。附条件不起诉制度源于德国和日本,已经成功运行了半个世纪,而在我国新修订的刑事诉讼法中刚刚确立。本文在借鉴域外附条件不起诉立法模式的基础上,比较我国附条件不起诉,有针对性的提出我国附条件不起诉制度存在的问题,并就这些问题提出了一些合理化的建议。 全文共分为三个部分对附条件不起诉制度的相关问题进行了阐述。 第一章主要介绍我国《刑事诉讼法》附条件不起诉制度的制定背景、意义、特点及适用条件,通过现阶段我国基层检察院试点工作来发现并提出我国附条件不起诉制度存在的问题。 第二章是附条件不起诉制度的比较研究,对其他国家和地区的类似制度进行考察,将这些做法的共性与区别进行比较,使之成为完善我国附条件不起诉制度的借鉴。 第三章对我国完善附条件不起诉制度提出合理化建议。通过借鉴域外先进的立法模式,结合我国现有制度,来解决附条件不起诉制度在实践中的问题,并提出设立听证程序、引入监督制约机制来进一步完善附条件不起诉制度。
[Abstract]:The system of conditional non-prosecution, as a form of discretion and non-prosecution, is the effective application of restorative justice in our country, the product of cheap prosecution and litigation economy, and embodies the idea of decriminalization and non-punishment. The system of conditional non-prosecution originated from Germany and Japan has been running successfully for half a century and has just been established in the newly revised Criminal procedure Law of our country. Based on the legislative model of extra-territorial conditional non-prosecution, this paper compares China's conditional non-prosecution, puts forward the problems in China's conditional non-prosecution system, and puts forward some reasonable suggestions on these problems. The full text is divided into three parts to explain the related problems of conditional non-prosecution system. The first chapter mainly introduces the background, significance, characteristics and applicable conditions of the conditional non-prosecution system in the Criminal procedure Law of our country. Through the pilot work of our country's basic procuratorate at the present stage, the problems existing in the system of conditional non-prosecution are found and put forward. The second chapter is the comparative study of conditional non-prosecution system, to investigate the similar systems in other countries and regions, compare the commonness and difference of these practices, make them become the reference to perfect the system of conditional non-prosecution in our country. The third chapter puts forward some reasonable suggestions to improve the system of conditional non-prosecution in our country. By drawing lessons from the foreign advanced legislative model and combining the existing system of our country, this paper solves the problem of conditional non-prosecution system in practice, and puts forward the establishment of hearing procedure and the introduction of supervision and restriction mechanism to further improve the system of conditional non-prosecution.
【学位授予单位】:兰州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D925.2
本文编号:2309920
[Abstract]:The system of conditional non-prosecution, as a form of discretion and non-prosecution, is the effective application of restorative justice in our country, the product of cheap prosecution and litigation economy, and embodies the idea of decriminalization and non-punishment. The system of conditional non-prosecution originated from Germany and Japan has been running successfully for half a century and has just been established in the newly revised Criminal procedure Law of our country. Based on the legislative model of extra-territorial conditional non-prosecution, this paper compares China's conditional non-prosecution, puts forward the problems in China's conditional non-prosecution system, and puts forward some reasonable suggestions on these problems. The full text is divided into three parts to explain the related problems of conditional non-prosecution system. The first chapter mainly introduces the background, significance, characteristics and applicable conditions of the conditional non-prosecution system in the Criminal procedure Law of our country. Through the pilot work of our country's basic procuratorate at the present stage, the problems existing in the system of conditional non-prosecution are found and put forward. The second chapter is the comparative study of conditional non-prosecution system, to investigate the similar systems in other countries and regions, compare the commonness and difference of these practices, make them become the reference to perfect the system of conditional non-prosecution in our country. The third chapter puts forward some reasonable suggestions to improve the system of conditional non-prosecution in our country. By drawing lessons from the foreign advanced legislative model and combining the existing system of our country, this paper solves the problem of conditional non-prosecution system in practice, and puts forward the establishment of hearing procedure and the introduction of supervision and restriction mechanism to further improve the system of conditional non-prosecution.
【学位授予单位】:兰州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D925.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 申世涛;;刑事相对不起诉制度与暂缓起诉制度适用范围关系研究[J];成都大学学报(教育科学版);2008年01期
2 孙力,刘中发;暂缓起诉制度再研究[J];法学杂志;2004年05期
3 张国利;陈学琢;;对未成年人犯罪适用不起诉问题的探讨[J];辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报;2008年03期
4 游常庆;未成年人刑事案件适用暂缓起诉制度的可行性探究[J];检察实践;2003年03期
5 陈光中;张建伟;;附条件不起诉:检察裁量权的新发展[J];人民检察;2006年07期
6 陈光中;;关于附条件不起诉问题的思考[J];人民检察;2007年24期
7 陈国庆;;不起诉制度的观点争议回应[J];人民检察;2007年24期
8 汉斯-耶尔格·阿尔布莱希特;赵阳;赵又芳;;刑事诉讼中的变通政策以及检察官在法庭审理开始前的作用[J];诉讼法论丛;1999年00期
9 于军;张宇;杨淑红;;新刑诉法附条件不起诉运行中可能存在的问题及对策——基于上海浦东检察机关诉前考察教育的司法实践[J];上海公安高等专科学校学报;2012年05期
10 孙长永;;日本的起诉犹豫制度及其借鉴意义[J];中外法学;1992年06期
,本文编号:2309920
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2309920.html