我国电子数据证明力研究

发布时间：2018-11-06 20:32

【摘要】：随着现代信息技术的高速发展,涉及电子数据的案件也日益增多,提交到法庭上的电子数据证据越来越多,电子数据在诉讼中的作用也日益增加。电子数据除了具有一般证据的特点,还有其独特的特点,如多样性、依赖性、开放性等特征,正是由于其独特的特点给传统证据法学界带来了巨大的冲击,同时也给司法实践中对电子数据的收集、保全、审查判断带来了许多新问题。现有的关于电子数据研究中,大多数的研究关注的是电子数据的证明能力,而对其证明力的研究较少。目前,我国诉讼证据制度中对电子数据相关规定较为简单、分散,且内容存在冲突。电子数据的多样性、开放性、依赖性等特征导致对其证明力的认定变得困难。此外,立法上的不完善,如缺乏对电子数据证明力认定规则的相应规定、司法解释中的相关规定较为笼统等;司法实践中的不足,司法工作人员普遍缺少高科技信息知识,有关鉴定机构不够健全、难以确定实际操作人的身份等;这些立法、司法实践、以及电子数据特性引发的问题,使得电子数据的证明力较低,从而会影响诉讼的效率与诉讼的目的的实现。本文分为四个部分来对电子数据证明力进行研究:第一部分主要是梳理电子数据证明力基本理论,对其含义以及证据证明力的内涵及特征进行分析,阐述认定其证明力需要从电子数据的关联性程度、可靠性、完整性出发。第二部分是对我国电子数据证明力现状及存在问题的分析,从立法、司法、电子数据特点方面来分析我国电子数据证明力存在问题。第三部分是对域外电子数据证明力立法方面的考察,通过对英美法系、大陆法系、以及两种法系的比较分析,从而对我国提高其证明力有所启发。第四部分提出提高我国电子数据证明力的路径,从其认定规则、保全制度、引入专家辅助人等方面对提出完善电子数据证明力方法。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of modern information technology, the number of cases involving electronic data is increasing, more and more electronic data evidence is submitted to the court, and the role of electronic data in litigation is increasing day by day. In addition to the characteristics of general evidence, electronic data has its unique characteristics, such as diversity, dependence, openness and so on. It is precisely because of its unique characteristics that it has brought great impact to the legal circle of traditional evidence. At the same time, it brings many new problems to the collection, preservation and examination of electronic data in judicial practice. In the current research on electronic data, most of the researches focus on the proof ability of electronic data, but the research on the proof power of electronic data is less. At present, the rules on electronic data in the system of litigation evidence in our country are relatively simple, scattered and conflicting. The diversity, openness and dependence of electronic data make it difficult to identify the power of proof. In addition, the legislation is not perfect, such as the lack of electronic data certification rules of the corresponding provisions, judicial interpretation of the relevant provisions are relatively general. Lack of judicial practice, judicial staff generally lack of high-tech information knowledge, the identification of the relevant institutions are not perfect, difficult to determine the identity of the actual operator, and so on; These problems caused by legislation, judicial practice and the characteristics of electronic data make the proof of electronic data low, which will affect the efficiency of litigation and the realization of the purpose of litigation. This paper is divided into four parts to study the power of proof of electronic data: the first part is to sort out the basic theory of the power of proof of electronic data, and analyze its meaning and the connotation and characteristics of the power of proof of evidence. This paper expounds that the proof of electronic data should be based on the degree of relevance, reliability and integrity of electronic data. The second part is the analysis of the current situation and existing problems of electronic data proving power in China, from the aspects of legislation, judicature, electronic data characteristics, to analyze the existing problems of electronic data proof power in our country. The third part is an investigation on the legislation of the power of proof of electronic data abroad. Through the comparative analysis of the common law system, the civil law system and the two legal systems, it is enlightening to improve the power of proof in our country. The fourth part puts forward the way to improve the proof power of electronic data in our country, and puts forward the method of perfecting the power of proof of electronic data from the aspects of its identification rules, preservation system and the introduction of expert assistant.
【学位授予单位】：贵州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925

【相似文献】