我国民事再审程序中新的证据
发布时间：2018-11-07 12:15
【摘要】：民事再审事由是通往民事再审程序的一张大门，而新的证据是重要的再审事由之一，但是我国民事诉讼法和相关司法解释关于新的证据的规定存在矛盾和冲突，在司法实践中也存在着诸多弊端，而对新的证据进行限制，是世界立法发展的潮流，就再审新的证据而言，我国《民事诉讼法》并没有明确规定如何适用再审新的证据，只在司法解释中有所体现，但是也存在不完善的问题，没有使新的证据在再审中发挥其应有的作用。完善再审程序新的证据规则，建立各项配套制度，使新的证据制度发挥其效能，则显得十分必要。本文首先对我国民事再审新的证据的现状进行了分析，，通过对再审程序中的新的证据和一、二审程序中的新的证据比较，概括出民事再审程序中新的证据的概念，介绍了我国立法、司法解释中关于民事再审程序新的证据有关规定，阐述了民事再审程序中新的证据的价值取向；其次剖析和比较各国立法例，本部分通过对大陆法系关于新的证据立法的比较分析,发现新的证据在其立法中或多或少都有所体现，但是由于各国各地区的审判模式、法律观念、法律传统存在差异，新的证据的表现形式各不相同；最后指出了我国再审程序中新的证据存在的问题，就重新确立民事再审新的证据的要件和认定标准，如何完善民事再审新的证据的各项制度提出笔者个人的观点,使新的证据规则发挥其应有的效用。
[Abstract]:The cause of civil retrial is a gateway to the civil retrial procedure, and the new evidence is one of the important reasons for retrial. However, there are contradictions and conflicts between the civil procedure law and the relevant judicial interpretation of the new evidence. There are many disadvantages in the judicial practice, and restricting the new evidence is the trend of the development of the world legislation. As far as the new evidence of retrial is concerned, the Civil procedure Law of our country has not clearly stipulated how to apply the new evidence of the retrial. Only reflected in the judicial interpretation, but also there are imperfect problems, did not make the new evidence in the retrial play its due role. It is necessary to perfect the new evidence rules of retrial procedure, to establish various supporting systems and to make the new evidence system exert its efficiency. This paper first analyzes the present situation of the new evidence in the civil retrial procedure in China. By comparing the new evidence in the retrial procedure with the new evidence in the first and second instance procedure, the author generalizes the concept of the new evidence in the civil retrial procedure. This paper introduces the new evidential provisions of the civil retrial procedure in the legislation and judicial interpretation of our country, and expounds the value orientation of the new evidence in the civil retrial procedure. Secondly, through the comparative analysis of the new evidence legislation in the civil law system, it is found that the new evidence is more or less embodied in the legislation, but due to the trial mode in various countries and regions, There are differences in legal concepts and legal traditions, and the forms of expression of new evidence are different; Finally, it points out the existing problems of the new evidence in the procedure of retrial in our country, and puts forward the author's personal views on how to re-establish the elements and standards of the new evidence in the civil retrial, and how to perfect the various systems of the new evidence in the civil retrial. Make the new rule of evidence work as it should.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.13
本文编号：2316344
[Abstract]:The cause of civil retrial is a gateway to the civil retrial procedure, and the new evidence is one of the important reasons for retrial. However, there are contradictions and conflicts between the civil procedure law and the relevant judicial interpretation of the new evidence. There are many disadvantages in the judicial practice, and restricting the new evidence is the trend of the development of the world legislation. As far as the new evidence of retrial is concerned, the Civil procedure Law of our country has not clearly stipulated how to apply the new evidence of the retrial. Only reflected in the judicial interpretation, but also there are imperfect problems, did not make the new evidence in the retrial play its due role. It is necessary to perfect the new evidence rules of retrial procedure, to establish various supporting systems and to make the new evidence system exert its efficiency. This paper first analyzes the present situation of the new evidence in the civil retrial procedure in China. By comparing the new evidence in the retrial procedure with the new evidence in the first and second instance procedure, the author generalizes the concept of the new evidence in the civil retrial procedure. This paper introduces the new evidential provisions of the civil retrial procedure in the legislation and judicial interpretation of our country, and expounds the value orientation of the new evidence in the civil retrial procedure. Secondly, through the comparative analysis of the new evidence legislation in the civil law system, it is found that the new evidence is more or less embodied in the legislation, but due to the trial mode in various countries and regions, There are differences in legal concepts and legal traditions, and the forms of expression of new evidence are different; Finally, it points out the existing problems of the new evidence in the procedure of retrial in our country, and puts forward the author's personal views on how to re-establish the elements and standards of the new evidence in the civil retrial, and how to perfect the various systems of the new evidence in the civil retrial. Make the new rule of evidence work as it should.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.13
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 熊跃敏;;民事再审案件审理程序论略——以再审诉权为基础的程序建构[J];法学杂志;2007年01期
2 薛焕彬;;民事再审程序中新证据的理解与适用[J];法学与实践;2007年02期
3 黄维智;;刑事案件中“情况说明”的适当定位[J];法学;2007年07期
4 许彩云;赵强;;论我国民事审前程序的完善[J];河北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年03期
5 孙辙;新的证据与相对化的举证时限制度[J];人民司法;2002年05期
6 李后龙;花玉军;葛文;;再审新证据认定和运用的实证分析[J];人民司法;2009年21期
7 姜龙;马忠瑜;;民事再审程序中“新证据”规定的不足与完善[J];山东审判(山东法官培训学院学报);2006年03期
8 陈洪杰;;新《民事诉讼法》中的“新的证据”应作如何理解——兼与张卫平教授商榷[J];学术界;2008年03期
9 付婷婷;;民事再审启动事由中新证据的界定[J];山西省政法管理干部学院学报;2008年02期
10 李浩;;举证时限制度的困境与出路——追问证据失权的正义性[J];中国法学;2005年03期
本文编号：2316344
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2316344.html
