论死刑复核程序中的检察监督

发布时间：2018-11-16 16:07

【摘要】：死刑复核程序是一种特殊的审判程序,我国在《刑事诉讼法》中专章详细规定了此程序的具体操作规范,对保证死刑判决结果的准确性发挥了重要的作用。死刑被执行之后,其纠正就非常的困难,因此,这个程序要具有必要的严肃性与特殊性,法律赋予了其与一审程序、二审程序相当的地位,旨在将此程序作为确保死刑正确适用的"马奇诺防线"。检察机关是重要的法律监督机关,在保障人权、维护社会公平正义方面发挥了不可或缺的作用。然而,现阶段我国刑事立法与刑事司法的缺陷严重限制了检察监督在死刑复核程序中的功用,导致捡察监督"束之高阁"。本文以详实的法学专业知识为支撑,以笔者对检察监督制度价值的理性思考为起点,运用文献分析法等研究方法探寻制约检察机关在死刑复核程序中不能有效履行相关监督职能的刑事立法与刑事司法的现实因素,并据此提出了一些针对性的建议,如在《刑事诉讼法》中近一步明确检察机关对此程序的监督权、调整案件的审理形式为检察监督提供可能,目的是为了进一步充实刑事诉讼中检察监督的相关法规,同时健全检察监督的相关机制,特别是建立和完善合议庭讯问复核被告人检察介入制度以及健全法检两院有关死刑复核案件信息通报制度,以期有助于确保死刑执行的准确性、实现宪法有关人权保障的宗旨。笔者认为,检察机关在死刑复核程序中所起到的作用非常重要,通过内部监督与外部监督并举才能够增强该程序的透明性,确保死刑适用的正确性。
[Abstract]:The death penalty review procedure is a kind of special trial procedure. In the special chapter of Criminal procedure Law, our country has stipulated the concrete operation standard of this procedure in detail, which has played an important role in ensuring the accuracy of the death penalty judgment result. After the execution of the death penalty, it is very difficult to correct it. Therefore, this procedure should have the necessary seriousness and particularity. The law has given it a status equal to that of the first instance procedure and the second instance procedure. The purpose of this procedure is to ensure the proper application of the death penalty as the "Magino line of defense." Procuratorial organ is an important legal supervision organ, which plays an indispensable role in protecting human rights and safeguarding social fairness and justice. However, at present, the defects of criminal legislation and criminal judicature in our country seriously limit the function of procuratorial supervision in the procedure of death penalty review, which leads to the "shelving" of inspection and supervision. This paper is supported by the detailed knowledge of law, and the author's rational thinking on the value of the procuratorial supervision system is the starting point. By using the methods of literature analysis and other research methods, this paper explores the practical factors that restrict the procuratorial organs from performing the relevant supervisory functions effectively in the death penalty review procedure, and puts forward some pertinent suggestions accordingly. For example, in the Criminal procedure Law, the procuratorial organ's supervisory power over this procedure is further clarified, and the trial form of the case is adjusted to provide the possibility for procuratorial supervision. The purpose is to further enrich the relevant laws and regulations on procuratorial supervision in criminal proceedings. At the same time, we should improve the relevant mechanisms of procuratorial supervision, in particular the establishment and improvement of the procuratorial intervention system of the collegial panel for interrogation and review of the accused and the information notification system of the death penalty review cases between the law and the procurators, with a view to helping to ensure the accuracy of the execution of the death penalty. To realize the purpose of the Constitution concerning the protection of human rights. The author thinks that the procuratorial organ plays a very important role in the procedure of death penalty review. The transparency of the procedure can be enhanced through both internal and external supervision, and the correctness of the application of the death penalty can be ensured.
【学位授予单位】：山西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D925.2;D926.3

【相似文献】