捕后羁押必要性审查制度的分析与完善

发布时间：2018-11-17 13:50

【摘要】：现行《刑事诉讼法》增加了第九十三条的规定,确立了我国捕后羁押必要性审查制度,最高人民检察院根据修订后的刑诉法制定的《人民检察院刑事诉讼规则(试行)》对这一制度的规定进行了细化。这一规定为检察机关行使法律监督职权提供了法律依据,充分体现了“保障人权”的宪法要求,对改变目前一旦批准逮捕,将无人过问、一押到底的状况具有重要意义,是这次《刑事诉讼法》修改的一大亮点。毕竟这是一项新的制度,在依据其进行司法实践时必然会存在一些问题和争议,为了更好地适用于司法实践,我们必须解决这些现存的问题和争议。目前关于这项制度,较大的问题和争议存在于审查主体,具体程序设置,结论及其救济和相关配套措施等方面。针对这些问题,结合域外规定及我国学者们的研究,现提出以下完善建议:第一,肯定法律对审查主体的规定,根据案件进行的阶段由检察机关在此阶段的负责部门进行审查。第二,完善审查运行程序的设置。启动程序方面,在执行逮捕时,执行机关要告知被逮捕人有申请羁押必要性审查的权利,可以口头申请也可以书面申请,以1个月作为启动周期。审查范围和内容方面,实行对所有案件进行审查,但是在全面审查基础上,对轻微刑事案件重点审查,并且适当增加审查的内容。具体的审查方式为,书面审查结合必要时听取意见的方式。审查期限方面,应当明确规定依申请进行审查的期限为3日,检察机关主动进行审查的期限为7日。审查结论方面,增加对审查结论的救济措施,既包括相关机关对检察机关建议不作为时的救济,也包括被羁押人对审查结论不服时的救济。第三,完善相应的配套制度,建立科学合理的量化评估机制,完善羁押替代措施,建立科学合理的考核机制。
[Abstract]:The present Criminal procedure Law has added the provisions of Article 93 and established the system of examining the necessity of detention after arrest in our country. The rules of Criminal procedure of the people's Procuratorate (trial) formulated by the Supreme people's Procuratorate according to the revised Criminal procedure Law have detailed the provisions of this system. This provision provides a legal basis for the procuratorial organs to exercise their functions and powers of legal supervision, fully embodies the constitutional requirements of "protecting human rights," and is of great significance to changing the current situation in which once arrest is approved, no one will be questioned and the situation will be put to the end. It is a bright spot in the revision of the Criminal procedure Law. After all, this is a new system, according to which there will inevitably be some problems and disputes in judicial practice. In order to be better applied to judicial practice, we must solve these existing problems and disputes. At present, there are some problems and disputes about this system, such as the subject of examination, the concrete procedure, the conclusion, the relief and the relative measures. In view of these problems, combined with the extraterritorial provisions and the study of Chinese scholars, this paper puts forward the following suggestions: first, confirm the provisions of the law on the subject of review, according to the stage of the case by the procuratorial organs in charge of this stage to review. Second, perfect the setting of review operation procedure. With regard to the initiation of the procedure, when executing the arrest, the executive organ shall inform the arrested person of his or her right to apply for a review of the necessity of detention, may apply orally or in writing, and take one month as the commencement cycle. In terms of scope and content, all cases are reviewed, but on the basis of a comprehensive review, minor criminal cases are reviewed with emphasis and, where appropriate, the content of the review is increased. The specific mode of examination is a written review in conjunction with the manner in which opinions are heard when necessary. In terms of the examination period, it should be specified that the time limit for the examination shall be 3 days for the application and 7 days for the procuratorial organ to initiate the examination. In the aspect of examination conclusion, the relief measures should be added, not only when the relevant organs do not act on the recommendation of the procuratorial organ, but also when the detainee is not satisfied with the conclusion of the examination. Third, perfect the corresponding supporting system, establish scientific and reasonable quantitative evaluation mechanism, perfect the alternative measures of custody, and establish a scientific and reasonable assessment mechanism.
【学位授予单位】：广东财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】