我国公诉方式改革研究

发布时间：2018-11-19 09:41

【摘要】：公诉方式是刑事诉讼程序中的一个重要环节。表面看来,公诉方式只是公诉机关向法院移送案卷材料的一种手续,但刑事诉讼公诉方式是一个国家诉讼模式、诉讼理念、法治现状以及国家政策的反映,其程序设置的合理科学与否,事关一个国家人权保障、正当程序和司法的公正和效率等问题,由此可见,公诉方式具有重要的研究价值。我国刑事诉讼在公诉方式方面经历了1979年刑诉法的强职权主义下的传统全案移送主义到1996年刑诉法的中国特色复印件主义,再到2013年新刑诉法重塑全案移送主义。我国公诉方式虽不断改革,但在司法实践中弊端层生,存在审前预断、庭审弱化等诸多问题,新刑诉法在着力解决问题规避弊端的原则下,回归全案移送主义公诉方式,但从长远发展来看,这只应是一种暂时过渡性方案,顺应我国刑事司法改革的大方向和世界刑事司法发展的大趋势,我国的刑事公诉方式应继续改革完善,推进庭审实质化改革进程,促进刑事司法的公正与效率。本文拟从四个方面论述我国公诉方式的改革。第一部分主要是介绍刑事公诉方式的基本理论和国外在公诉方式方面的相关立法规定,为深入研究公诉方式改革提供理论支撑；第二部分是我国公诉方式的反思。通过分析我国公诉方式的历史与现状,指出我国公诉方式存在的问题；第三部分是我国公诉方式改革的路径选择。通过分析指出我国刑事公诉方式仍有改革完善之必要,并进而提出笔者关于我国公诉方式改革的具体思路——二元公诉方式改革方案,并分析该改革方案的优越性；最后一部分是公诉方式改革的保障机制。刑事公诉方式是刑事诉讼程序的重要组成部分,为保障改革的有序进行我们应当系统完善相关配套制度。保障机制主要从改革简易程序启动方式、建立预审制度、构建证据开示制度、借鉴诉因制度完善起诉书撰写以及完善机制提高法官业务素质等方面来谈。
[Abstract]:Public prosecution is an important link in criminal procedure. On the face of it, the way of public prosecution is only a kind of procedure for transferring file materials to the court, but the mode of criminal prosecution is a reflection of the mode of national litigation, the concept of litigation, the present situation of the rule of law and the state policy. Whether the procedure is reasonable or not is related to the protection of human rights of a country, the fairness and efficiency of due process and judicature, and so on. Thus, it can be seen that the way of public prosecution has important research value. In the way of public prosecution, our country has experienced the traditional whole case transfer doctrine under the strong authority of the criminal procedure law in 1979 to the photocopy doctrine with Chinese characteristics of the criminal procedure law in 1996, and the new criminal procedure law in 2013 to reshape the whole case transfer doctrine. Although the mode of public prosecution in our country has been reformed continuously, there are many problems in judicial practice, such as prejudgment, weakening of trial, etc. Under the principle of solving the problem and avoiding the malpractice, the new criminal procedure law returns to the mode of transferring the whole case to the public prosecution. However, in the long run, this should be only a temporary transitional scheme, which conforms to the general direction of China's criminal justice reform and the general trend of the world's criminal justice development, and the way of criminal prosecution in our country should continue to be reformed and perfected. To promote the reform process of trial substance and promote the justice and efficiency of criminal justice. This paper discusses the reform of the way of public prosecution in China from four aspects. The first part mainly introduces the basic theory of criminal prosecution and the relevant legislative provisions of foreign countries in the way of public prosecution to provide theoretical support for in-depth research on the reform of public prosecution; the second part is the reflection of the way of public prosecution in China. By analyzing the history and present situation of the public prosecution mode in China, the author points out the problems existing in the public prosecution mode of our country, and the third part is the path choice of the reform of the public prosecution mode in our country. Through the analysis, the author points out that it is necessary to reform and perfect the mode of criminal prosecution in our country, and then puts forward the concrete train of thought about the reform of the mode of public prosecution in our country, that is, the reform scheme of dualistic public prosecution mode, and analyzes the superiority of the reform scheme. The last part is the safeguard mechanism of public prosecution reform. The mode of criminal prosecution is an important part of the criminal procedure. In order to ensure the orderly implementation of the reform, we should systematically improve the relevant supporting system. The guarantee mechanism is mainly discussed from the aspects of reforming the starting way of summary procedure, establishing the system of preliminary hearing, constructing the system of discovery of evidence, improving the writing of indictment by reference to the system of cause of action, and perfecting the mechanism to improve the professional quality of judges, etc.
【学位授予单位】：青岛大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】