我国民事宣判制度研究

发布时间：2018-11-21 07:50

【摘要】：民事宣判是民事诉讼程序的重要环节,研究民事宣判有重要的理论和现实意义。宣判民事判决或裁定文书,对于增强审判人员的法治意识、加强其责任感及实现程序公正与审判公开都具有重要意义,对树立法院的公信力与司法权威发挥着重要作用。民事判决或裁定的宣判在形式上可以让人民群众在每一个司法案件中感受到公平公正,让人民群众心悦诚服,彰显出司法公正的公信力,公平正义以人民群众看得见、感觉得到的方式得以实现。科学设计并实施宣判制度,法院、法官在民事审理的每一个环节,严格按照法定程序进行,秉承法治至上的司法理念,实现程序公正与实体公正相统一。本文第一部分对我国民事宣判制度进行的概念、价值、原则等法理分析。包括民事宣判概念的界定,民事宣判制度的特征、分类,民事宣判的价值、原则等等。第二部分对我国民事宣判制度的现状等实证分析。首先对我国国内有关宣判制度的法律规定进行了梳理;其次,简要阐述了司法领域贯彻实施民事宣判制度存在的问题及其问题产生的三个方面的原因:诉讼观念的原因,司法力量相对薄弱,法律规定的缺失。第三部分通过对两大法系国家民事宣判制度的立法进行分析,进而得出相关的启示与经验。第四部分提出了构建符合我国国情的民事宣判制度的主要内容。
[Abstract]:Civil judgment is an important link in civil procedure, and it is of great theoretical and practical significance to study it. Sentencing civil judgment or ruling document is of great significance to enhance the sense of rule of law, strengthen the sense of responsibility, realize the justice of procedure and open trial, and play an important role in establishing the credibility of the court and judicial authority. In the form of a civil judgment or ruling, the people can feel fair and just in every judicial case, let the people be honest and convinced, and show the credibility of judicial justice, which can be seen by the masses of the people. The way you feel is realized. Scientific design and implementation of the sentencing system, courts, judges in civil proceedings in every link, strictly in accordance with the legal procedures, adhering to the rule of law supreme judicial concept, to achieve the unity of procedural justice and substantive justice. The first part of this paper analyzes the concept, value and principle of the civil sentencing system in China. Including the definition of the concept of civil sentencing, the characteristics of civil sentencing system, classification, the value of civil sentencing, principles and so on. The second part of the civil sentencing system in China such as the current situation of empirical analysis. First of all, the domestic legal provisions of the sentencing system are combed; Secondly, it briefly expounds the problems existing in the implementation of the civil sentencing system in the judicial field and the three reasons for the problems: the reasons of the concept of litigation, the relative weakness of the judicial power, and the lack of legal provisions. The third part analyzes the legislation of the civil sentencing system in the two legal system countries, and draws the relevant enlightenment and experience. The fourth part puts forward the main contents of constructing the civil sentencing system in accordance with the national conditions of our country.
【学位授予单位】：青岛大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.1

【参考文献】