民事诉讼当事人文书提出义务研究

发布时间：2018-11-21 08:14

【摘要】：文书提出义务是当事人收集证据的重要途径,它不仅是辩论主义的逻辑产物,而且是现代民事诉讼目的观发展的体现,同时也是诚实信用原则的具体化。文书提出义务制度立足于当事人的举证权,在恢复当事人之间武器平等、发现真实并促进审理集中化、实现公平正义等方面意义重大。综观2015年最高人民法院关于适用《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》的解释(以下简称《民诉法司法解释》)、2012年《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》(以下简称《民事诉讼法》)、2001年《最高人民法院关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》(以下简称《民事证据规定》)等相关规定,表明了我国已经初步确立民事诉讼当事人文书提出义务制度,但相关立法以及司法解释相对粗疏且过于分散,尚未形成体系化,又缺乏可供其良性开展的基本逻辑前提和相关配套制度,在司法适用的过程中面临困境。通过比较分析大陆法系国家和地区的文书提出义务制度与英美法系国家的证据开示制度,正确理解和借鉴域外较为系统的理论基础以及成熟的立法技巧,同时认真审视我国当前的社会环境以及民事诉讼制度。努力完善我国的文书提出义务制度并让其充分发挥出实效性,是研究该制度的目的所在。在我国,确立约束性辩论主义,对文书提出义务的适用范围、适用程序以及违反之法律后果进行细化和明确,搭建起一套完整的规则体系,从而充实和保障当事人的证据收集能力是完善该制度的必由之路,有利于我国民事诉讼的稳健发展,同时回应并满足社会基本诉求。
[Abstract]:The obligation of filing documents is an important way for the parties to collect evidence. It is not only the logical product of argumentation, but also the embodiment of the development of the modern view of the purpose of civil action, and the embodiment of the principle of good faith. It is of great significance to restore the weapon equality between the parties, to find the truth and to promote the centralization of the trial, and to realize the fairness and justice. A comprehensive view of the interpretation of the application of the Civil procedure Law of the people's Republic of China by the Supreme people's Court in 2015 (hereinafter referred to as the Judicial interpretation of the Civil procedure Law), the 2012 Civil procedure Law of the people's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the Civil procedure Law), The relevant provisions of the Supreme people's Court on evidence in Civil Litigation in 2001 (hereinafter referred to as "provisions on Civil evidence") indicate that China has preliminarily established the system of filing obligations of civil litigants. However, the relevant legislation and judicial interpretation are relatively careless and too scattered, have not yet formed systematization, and lack of the basic logical premise for its benign development and relevant supporting system, so it faces difficulties in the process of judicial application. Through the comparative analysis of the civil law system and the evidence discovery system in the countries and regions of the civil law system and the common law system countries, we can correctly understand and draw lessons from the theoretical basis and mature legislative techniques of the extraterritorial relatively systematic system. At the same time carefully examine our current social environment and civil litigation system. The purpose of this study is to improve the system of obligation and make it effective. In our country, we should establish the principle of binding debate, refine and clarify the scope of application of the obligation, the procedure of application and the legal consequences of violation, and set up a complete system of rules. So it is the only way to perfect the system to enrich and protect the evidence collection ability of the parties, which is conducive to the steady development of civil litigation in China, and to respond to and meet the basic demands of the society at the same time.
【学位授予单位】：华侨大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】