刑事判决在民事诉讼中的效力--英国规则的演进与启示
发布时间：2018-11-21 11:18
【摘要】：自17世纪开始,英国的刑事判决在民事诉讼中的预决力规则总体上经历了从"不可采"到"有限可采"的发展与变化历程。证据规则、判决效力规则等技术性因素与程序公正、节约司法资源、维护裁判统一性等政策性因素的共同作用,决定了刑事判决预决力的作用范围与作用方式。在我国,技术性规范的缺失与实务中法官基于工作便利、规避风险等现实需求考虑,导致了刑事判决预决力在立法与实务中的扩大化与绝对化。欲解决这一问题,必须对刑事判决涉及的事实进行细致分类,对刑事判决的预决力的范围进行精确的界定。同时,还应从维护案外人程序参与权、民事审判权的独立性与专业性的角度,对刑事判决的预决力加以限制。
[Abstract]:Since the 17th century, the pre-determination rules of British criminal judgments in civil proceedings have generally experienced the development and change from "inadmissibility" to "limited admissibility". The joint action of technical factors such as the rules of evidence and the rules of validity of judgment and procedural justice, the saving of judicial resources and the maintenance of the unity of adjudication and other policy-related factors determines the scope and mode of action of the pre-determination force of criminal judgment. In our country, the lack of technical norms and the consideration of practical requirements such as convenience of work and avoidance of risks lead to the expansion and absolutization of the pre-determination power of criminal judgment in legislation and practice. In order to solve this problem, it is necessary to classify the facts involved in the criminal judgment and to define precisely the range of the determination power of the criminal judgment. At the same time, from the angle of safeguarding the right of participation in procedure and the independence and professionalism of civil jurisdiction, the predetermination of criminal judgment should be restricted.
【作者单位】： "2011计划"·司法文明协同创新中心;中国政法大学民商经济法学院;
【基金】：2016年度中国政法大学青年教师学术创新团队“刑民交叉案件诉讼问题研究”(16CXTD06) 2015年度北京市社科基金项目“刑事判决在民事诉讼中的效力研究”(15FXB016)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D956.1;DD915.2
，
本文编号：2346808
[Abstract]:Since the 17th century, the pre-determination rules of British criminal judgments in civil proceedings have generally experienced the development and change from "inadmissibility" to "limited admissibility". The joint action of technical factors such as the rules of evidence and the rules of validity of judgment and procedural justice, the saving of judicial resources and the maintenance of the unity of adjudication and other policy-related factors determines the scope and mode of action of the pre-determination force of criminal judgment. In our country, the lack of technical norms and the consideration of practical requirements such as convenience of work and avoidance of risks lead to the expansion and absolutization of the pre-determination power of criminal judgment in legislation and practice. In order to solve this problem, it is necessary to classify the facts involved in the criminal judgment and to define precisely the range of the determination power of the criminal judgment. At the same time, from the angle of safeguarding the right of participation in procedure and the independence and professionalism of civil jurisdiction, the predetermination of criminal judgment should be restricted.
【作者单位】： "2011计划"·司法文明协同创新中心;中国政法大学民商经济法学院;
【基金】：2016年度中国政法大学青年教师学术创新团队“刑民交叉案件诉讼问题研究”(16CXTD06) 2015年度北京市社科基金项目“刑事判决在民事诉讼中的效力研究”(15FXB016)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D956.1;DD915.2
，
本文编号：2346808
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2346808.html
