“侦查重心主义”研究——对“以审判为中心”诉讼制度改革的反思与拓展

发布时间：2018-11-22 13:48

【摘要】："以审判为中心"诉讼制度改革的主要内容是推进庭审实质化,但庭审实质化仅单向强化了错案过滤功能,加之审判者的深层认知心理因素、证据信息在诉讼进程整合中的有罪强化趋势等因素的影响,以及实质化的庭审程序仅能适用于少量案件等,其对实体公正的整体保障作用将是有限的。英美对抗式审判仍产生了大量错案即为明证。解说当前改革的两种代表性意见都高估了庭审实质化的作用,提升实体公正水平应贯彻"侦查重心主义"。此概念与传统的"侦查中心主义"不同,可以融入当前改革,并要求深化改革。贯彻"侦查重心主义"要求对侦查行为进行程序控制;防止以虚假供述为主要目标强化辩护人的监督权;并强化侦查录音录像,为还原侦查过程提供可能。
[Abstract]:The main content of the reform of the litigation system of "taking trial as the center" is to promote the materialization of the trial, but the materialization of the trial only strengthens the filtering function of the wrong case in one direction, in addition to the deep cognitive and psychological factors of the judge. The influence of evidence information in the consolidation of litigation process, such as the tendency of guilt reinforcement, and the fact that the substantial trial procedure can only be applied to a small number of cases, will have a limited effect on the overall protection of substantive justice. Anglo-American adversarial trial still produced a large number of wrong cases is clear evidence. The two representative opinions of the current reform both overestimate the role of the materialization of the trial, and enhance the level of substantive justice should carry out the "focus of investigation". This concept is different from the traditional "investigative centralism", it can be integrated into the current reform and requires deepening the reform. To carry out the principle of "focus of investigation", we should control the procedure of investigation behavior, prevent the false confession as the main target and strengthen the supervisory power of defenders, and strengthen the audio and video recording of investigation, which provides the possibility to restore the process of investigation.
【作者单位】：南京大学法学院;
【基金】：2016年国家社会科学基金一般项目“隐蔽性证据虚假补强问题研究”(15BFX096)
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】