判决书充分说理的条件及其应用
发布时间：2018-11-24 16:46
【摘要】：判决书充分说理需要两个条件:必要条件,即民法学、民事诉讼法学的一套概念系统;充分条件,即根据这一套概念系统对判决主文所进行的论证。如果法官可以拿捏到这样的细节层面,就能够落实辩论主义下两造民事主体的自我责任法理,从而夯实判决结果的正当性。司法实践却表明,法官对法律概念与论证两方面贯彻不力,从而使说理不充分问题成为久治不愈的顽疾。在司法改革的技术层面,不仅有必要对判决书样式做相应调整,更有必要通过司法解释要求法官运用说理性的法律概念与论证性的演绎思维。
[Abstract]:There are two conditions for full reasoning of judgment: necessary condition, namely, civil law, a set of concept system of civil procedure law, and sufficient condition, that is, the proof of judgment subject according to this set of concept system. If the judge can grasp such details, he can carry out the legal principle of self-responsibility of the two civil subjects under the doctrine of debate, thus solidifying the legitimacy of the judgment result. However, judicial practice shows that judges do not carry out the concept and argument of law effectively, so that the problem of insufficient reasoning becomes a persistent problem. In the technical aspect of judicial reform, it is necessary not only to adjust the judgment style, but also to require judges to use the rational legal concept and the deductive thinking of argumentation through judicial interpretation.
【作者单位】： 烟台大学法学院;中欧侵权法研究中心;烟台市牟平区市场监督管理局;
【基金】：中国法学会课题《民事判决书说理之基本构造》(CLS(2014)D088)的成果
【分类号】：D925.1
本文编号：2354390
[Abstract]:There are two conditions for full reasoning of judgment: necessary condition, namely, civil law, a set of concept system of civil procedure law, and sufficient condition, that is, the proof of judgment subject according to this set of concept system. If the judge can grasp such details, he can carry out the legal principle of self-responsibility of the two civil subjects under the doctrine of debate, thus solidifying the legitimacy of the judgment result. However, judicial practice shows that judges do not carry out the concept and argument of law effectively, so that the problem of insufficient reasoning becomes a persistent problem. In the technical aspect of judicial reform, it is necessary not only to adjust the judgment style, but also to require judges to use the rational legal concept and the deductive thinking of argumentation through judicial interpretation.
【作者单位】： 烟台大学法学院;中欧侵权法研究中心;烟台市牟平区市场监督管理局;
【基金】：中国法学会课题《民事判决书说理之基本构造》(CLS(2014)D088)的成果
【分类号】：D925.1
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 冯用军;;跨学科视野的“新科举学”:概念系统与方法论[J];考试研究;2011年06期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 北京外国语大学外国语言研究所 王馥芳;概念系统研究：认知语言学的独特理论贡献[N];中国社会科学报;2014年
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 占小红;中学生“物质的量”概念系统认知发展研究[D];华东师范大学;2006年
2 林姗姗;《城市公共交通系统与技术》教材翻译项目中的术语管理[D];成都理工大学;2014年
3 尤蕾蕾;“微粒间作用力”概念系统形成过程的微观研究[D];华东师范大学;2011年
，本文编号：2354390
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2354390.html
