当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 诉讼法论文 >

刑事和解制度的风险与应对

发布时间:2018-12-07 12:48
【摘要】:建设社会主义和谐社会理念的确立,被害人权益保护理念逐渐的深入人心,为刑事和解制度在我国司法实践中的应用提供了肥沃的土壤,也为我国的司法改革问题指明了前进的方向,更为我们建设社会主义和谐社会提供了全新的思维方式。惩罚犯罪和保障人权是我国刑事诉讼法的主要理念之一。因此我们在制定法律法规的时候必须围绕着这个目标进行。然而这导致了我们过多的关心犯罪人的权利,却对被害人的权利长期忽视。这必然是我们未来司法改革中所亟待解决的问题。 刑事诉讼法将公诉案件的刑事和解制度纳入其中,是刑事和解制度法律化和规范化的表现。在“大调解”的社会背景下,刑事和解制度写进刑事诉讼法有利于缓和社会矛盾,促进社会的和谐稳定。但刑事和解制度同样有其相应的风险和亟待完善与解决的问题。因此对刑事和解制度风险与应对的研究有利于降低刑事和解制度的风险,提高刑事和解的效率与社会时效性,从而推进我国社会主义社会稳定的发展。 本文主要由四个部分组成。 第一部分主要介绍刑事和解制度的概述,其中包括刑事和解制度概念,刑事和解制度的特征。通过将刑事和解制度与其相近的制度与概念进行比较分析,使得我们可以更好的认识刑事和解制度,从而为更好的完善刑事和解制度奠定了良好的制度基础。 第二部分主要考察了英美法系、大陆法系相关国家对于刑事和解制度的规定,通过对其刑事和解制度的立法考察,掌握其制度的优越性,为更好的完善我国的刑事和解制度提供良好的借鉴。 第三部分主要介绍了刑事和解制度可能产生哪些风险,并阐述了这些风险产生的原因,阐明了刑事和解制度中存在一定的漏洞,为更好的完善刑事和解制度提供了必要的条件。 第四部分主要介绍针对我国刑事和解制度中可能出现的风险问题,提出相应的应对及解决方案,虽然刑事和解制度会产生相应的风险,只要我们制度上去完善刑事和解制度,,从而把风险降低到最低,就能充分发挥刑事和解制度在社会主义和谐社会中的优越性。
[Abstract]:With the establishment of the concept of building a harmonious socialist society, the idea of protecting the rights and interests of the victims has gradually taken root in the hearts of the people, which provides a fertile soil for the application of the criminal reconciliation system in the judicial practice of our country. It also points out the direction of our judicial reform and provides a new way of thinking for us to build a harmonious socialist society. Punishing crime and protecting human rights is one of the main concepts of our criminal procedure law. So when we make laws and regulations, we have to focus on this goal. However, this leads us to care too much about the rights of the criminal, but neglect the rights of the victims for a long time. This is bound to be our future judicial reform problems to be solved. The criminal procedure law includes the criminal reconciliation system of public prosecution cases, which is the manifestation of legalization and standardization of criminal reconciliation system. Under the social background of "Great Mediation", the criminal reconciliation system is helpful to ease the social contradiction and promote the social harmony and stability. However, the system of criminal reconciliation also has its corresponding risks and problems that need to be improved and solved. Therefore, the study on the risks and countermeasures of the criminal reconciliation system is conducive to reducing the risks of the criminal reconciliation system, improving the efficiency and social timeliness of the criminal reconciliation system, and thus promoting the stable development of the socialist society in our country. This paper consists of four parts. The first part mainly introduces the outline of the criminal reconciliation system, including the concept of the criminal reconciliation system and the characteristics of the criminal reconciliation system. Through the comparative analysis of the criminal reconciliation system and its similar system and concept, we can better understand the criminal reconciliation system, thus laying a good institutional foundation for the better improvement of the criminal reconciliation system. The second part mainly examines the Anglo-American law system, the civil law system related countries to the criminal reconciliation system, through its criminal reconciliation system legislation investigation, master its system superiority. In order to better improve our criminal reconciliation system to provide a good reference. The third part mainly introduces the possible risks of the criminal reconciliation system, and expounds the causes of these risks, clarifies the existence of certain loopholes in the criminal reconciliation system, and provides the necessary conditions for the better improvement of the criminal reconciliation system. The fourth part mainly introduces the possible risk problems in the criminal reconciliation system of our country, and puts forward the corresponding countermeasures and solutions. Although the criminal reconciliation system will produce the corresponding risks, as long as we improve the criminal reconciliation system in the system, In order to reduce the risk to the lowest, we can give full play to the superiority of the criminal reconciliation system in the socialist harmonious society.
【学位授予单位】:辽宁大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D925.2

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前6条

1 何永军;;刑事和解的潜在风险[J];华东政法大学学报;2010年02期

2 陈光中;;刑事和解的理论基础与司法适用[J];人民检察;2006年10期

3 陈光发;;论刑事和解制度的风险与防范——以新《刑事诉讼法》为视角[J];社科纵横(新理论版);2012年03期

4 刘凌梅;西方国家刑事和解理论与实践介评[J];现代法学;2001年01期

5 孙昌军,陈炜;试论英国公司法人犯罪法律价值观念的新变化[J];现代法学;1999年02期

6 黄峰;桂兴卫;;刑事和解机制的探索与实践——以某基层检察院的和解不起诉为切入点[J];中国刑事法杂志;2008年04期



本文编号:2367233

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2367233.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户f0e0c***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com