论刑事附带民事诉讼赔偿制度的缺陷与完善
发布时间:2018-12-07 20:53
【摘要】:刑事附带民事诉讼赔偿制度有利于安抚被害人、维护被害人的经济利益,可以减少被害人家属的负担,有利于保证人民法院审判工作的统一性和严肃性,节省司法资源。但是,我国刑事附带民事赔偿制度最初是支持伤残赔偿金、死亡赔偿金的,后来经过最新的相关司法解释又取消了对伤残赔偿金和死亡赔偿金的支持。这在我国法制改革过程中这是一种司法倒退的现象,应当引起立法和司法界对于我国刑事附带民事诉讼赔偿制度的关注。我国现行的刑事附带民事诉讼赔偿制度存在赔偿请求权主体范围太过狭窄、赔偿范围太过狭窄、赔偿义务人范围太过狭窄及赔偿标准不统一且不合理等缺陷。应当扩大赔偿请求权主体适格范围,并合理调整赔偿义务人的判定方式。另外需要将赔偿的范围进行合理的、贴合理论与实践要求的调整。即应当根据刑事附带民事诉讼的性质将其予以采纳的赔偿范围进行重新规范或适当补充。总的来说,笔者的建议是要将刑事附带民事的赔偿标准扩大至民事赔偿的范畴,使其更加贴近生活。与此同时,除了上述对该制度主体、客体的完善外,国家还应当在制度层面上予以配合建立健全相应的救济制度,为建立统一的赔偿标准做铺垫。
[Abstract]:The system of compensation for criminal incidental civil proceedings is beneficial to appease the victims, safeguard the economic interests of the victims, reduce the burden on the family members of the victims, ensure the unity and seriousness of the trial work of the people's courts, and save the judicial resources. However, the criminal incidental civil compensation system in our country initially supports the disability compensation and death compensation, and then cancels the support for the disability compensation and death compensation after the latest relevant judicial explanation. This phenomenon is a kind of judicial retrogression in the process of our country's legal system reform, which should arouse the attention of the legislative and judicial circles to the compensation system of the criminal incidental civil action in our country. The current system of compensation for criminal incidental civil action has some defects such as too narrow scope of subject of claim, too narrow scope of compensation obligor and ununified and unreasonable standard of compensation. We should expand the scope of the subject of claim for compensation and rationally adjust the judgment mode of the indemnification obligor. In addition, the scope of compensation should be adjusted reasonably, in accordance with the theoretical and practical requirements. That is, the scope of compensation should be re-regulated or supplemented according to the nature of criminal incidental civil action. In a word, the author's suggestion is to extend the standard of civil compensation to make it more close to life. At the same time, in addition to the above improvement of the subject and object of the system, the state should cooperate in the establishment of the corresponding relief system at the institutional level, and pave the way for the establishment of a unified standard of compensation.
【学位授予单位】:烟台大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D925.2
本文编号:2367857
[Abstract]:The system of compensation for criminal incidental civil proceedings is beneficial to appease the victims, safeguard the economic interests of the victims, reduce the burden on the family members of the victims, ensure the unity and seriousness of the trial work of the people's courts, and save the judicial resources. However, the criminal incidental civil compensation system in our country initially supports the disability compensation and death compensation, and then cancels the support for the disability compensation and death compensation after the latest relevant judicial explanation. This phenomenon is a kind of judicial retrogression in the process of our country's legal system reform, which should arouse the attention of the legislative and judicial circles to the compensation system of the criminal incidental civil action in our country. The current system of compensation for criminal incidental civil action has some defects such as too narrow scope of subject of claim, too narrow scope of compensation obligor and ununified and unreasonable standard of compensation. We should expand the scope of the subject of claim for compensation and rationally adjust the judgment mode of the indemnification obligor. In addition, the scope of compensation should be adjusted reasonably, in accordance with the theoretical and practical requirements. That is, the scope of compensation should be re-regulated or supplemented according to the nature of criminal incidental civil action. In a word, the author's suggestion is to extend the standard of civil compensation to make it more close to life. At the same time, in addition to the above improvement of the subject and object of the system, the state should cooperate in the establishment of the corresponding relief system at the institutional level, and pave the way for the establishment of a unified standard of compensation.
【学位授予单位】:烟台大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D925.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 李强;李革明;;刑事附带民事诉讼赔偿范围的改造——以人身权利被侵害为视角[J];人民检察;2016年10期
2 张磊;;刑事附带民事诉讼的赔偿范围[J];重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版);2010年03期
3 孙启福;夏川;;死亡赔偿制度的嬗变及反思——以死亡赔偿金及精神抚慰金为视角[J];西南政法大学学报;2010年02期
4 吴伟聪;于晓军;王海鹏;高贵山;;统一损伤程度和伤残等级鉴定标准的探讨[J];医学研究杂志;2008年11期
5 姬亚平;论国家赔偿法的废止[J];南华大学学报(社会科学版);2004年03期
6 马怀德;国家赔偿责任的性质[J];法学研究;1994年02期
,本文编号:2367857
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2367857.html