民事案件执行难问题研究
[Abstract]:The difficulty of execution of civil cases has become an important issue affecting the judicial authority of our country, and it is also a hot issue that the masses of the people strongly respond to and people from all walks of life pay close attention to. The emergence and existence of the difficult problem of execution is the combination of various factors and contradictions, which not only seriously affects the judicial authority of the people's court, but also damages the legitimate rights and interests of the people. There are many reasons for the difficulty of implementation, including the imperfections of our national system and system, and some reasons within the Court, although this issue has now attracted attention and exploration from all sides. However, how to fundamentally solve it is still a big problem in front of us. At present, the academic and practical circles are vigorously exploring the ways and methods to solve the difficulties of implementation, and have gained a lot of valuable experience. This paper makes a study on the difficult problem of execution of civil cases, and puts forward some suggestions, hoping that it can be helpful to solve the difficult problem of execution. The paper is divided into three parts. The first part of this paper is an overview of the difficult problems in civil cases. This paper mainly introduces the current situation of the implementation problem in our country. Starting with the concept of compulsory execution, this paper probes into the definition of the difficulty in civil case execution, analyzes on the historical evolution and development course of the civil case execution difficulty in our country, and points out the social harm brought by the difficulty of civil case execution in China. Combined with the practice of execution, the author sums up six forms of expression, such as the difficulty of finding the executor, the difficulty of executing property, the difficulty of resisting the investigation of execution, and so on. The first part of the paper mainly uses the literature method, the data analysis method, the comparison method. The second part of the paper mainly from the perspective of comparative law, the implementation of foreign civil cases legislation comparative study, analysis of the foreign enforcement power of the division of the mode and foreign enforcement legislation adopted the main model. Several representative countries representing Anglo-American law system and civil law system as well as Taiwan are selected to analyze and compare the civil execution legislation. Some advanced execution concepts and scientific operation methods of these countries and regions are worthy of our country's absorbing and drawing lessons from, and have strong guiding significance to perfect our country's enforcement law system and solve the difficult problem of civil cases' execution. The third part focuses on the legal thinking and countermeasures to solve the difficulties in the execution of civil cases. This paper makes a deep analysis of the reasons for the difficulties in execution. The main reasons for the difficulties in execution are four aspects: first, the implementation legislation system is not perfect; the second is the implementation system is not perfect; and the third is the problems of the implementation work itself. Fourth, it is hindered by local protectionism. We must adhere to the principle of overall consideration, treatment of both symptoms and causes, multi-pronged approach and comprehensive implementation. First, it is necessary to strengthen the implementation of legislation, improve the implementation of the legal system. This paper mainly analyzes the shortcomings of the current enforcement law system, and puts forward that the enforcement provisions in the Civil procedure Law should be improved by perfecting the enforcement law, formulating a special enforcement law, and improving the enforcement provisions in the Civil procedure Law. We should perfect the punishment system of refusing to execute the judgment and order in the criminal law, and strengthen the enforcement of the legal system such as the property declaration and property management system of the person executed. Second, reform the executive management system and enrich enforcement measures. From the aspects of perfecting the executive management organization, strengthening the enforcement force and innovating the measures of executive thinking, the author puts forward the concrete requirements for the execution of the court. Third, improve the judicial environment and build a long-term enforcement mechanism. By perfecting the execution linkage mechanism, constructing the social credit system and perfecting the execution relief system, the long effect mechanism of the execution work is formed.
【学位授予单位】:山东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D925.18
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 赵祥华;浅析执行中止的若干问题[J];山东审判;2002年01期
2 杨红朝;;执行中止制度的改革与完善[J];安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版);2006年03期
3 李民;;质疑债权凭证[J];重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版);2006年04期
4 郭秋汝;;执行中止刍议——以英、美、法、德、日及我国台湾的立法为视角[J];商情(教育经济研究);2007年04期
5 于海燕;王洪军;;关山初度路犹长——山东法院执行工作30年回顾[J];山东审判;2008年S1期
6 宁亚伟;;颍东区法院分段集约执行制度浅析[J];人民司法;2011年03期
7 胡家强;张立群;;论执行不能案件的退出[J];中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版);2012年02期
8 肖安定;;民事执行中止程序的困境及对策[J];法制与社会;2012年33期
9 石少红;;规则与程序:执行法律制度的完善与健全——首届全省法院执行工作论坛综述[J];山东审判;2012年06期
10 王浩生;浅议执行中止弹性款项及其正确应用[J];法学天地;1994年01期
相关会议论文 前3条
1 何仁;袁晟翔;;司法执行难的博弈解读和一体化消解——以执行“双高”现象为基点展开[A];全国法院系统第二十二届学术讨论会论文集[C];2011年
2 张化冰;;论执行分权异行[A];当代法学论坛(2007年第4辑)[C];2007年
3 包娟;;论我国民事执行异议制度的完善[A];全国法院系统第二十二届学术讨论会论文集[C];2011年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 最高人民法院咨询委员会委员 邱创教;破解“执行难”的对策[N];人民法院报;2004年
2 康旭;以“执行公开”化解“执行难”[N];中国商报;2004年
3 刘振明邋孙峰 记者 郭树仁;东丰法院全面推行“阳光执行”[N];北方法制报;2007年
4 王加庚;现行法定的执行中止条件有缺陷[N];江苏经济报;2006年
5 张江涛邋吴春民;东营中院:执行工作实现三个100%[N];人民法院报;2007年
6 自治区高级人民法院 提供;规范执行行为 促进执行公正 下大力气解决执行难问题[N];西藏日报;2007年
7 记者 陈球邋实习生 颜安 通讯员 范贞;执行流程公开进程可查[N];南方日报;2008年
8 贾峰邋本报通讯员 韩继升;“多龙治水”破题执行难[N];青岛日报;2008年
9 北京市西城区人民法院 侯静;消除执行积案的几点建议[N];人民法院报;2008年
10 本报记者 马宏萍;阳光执行带来阳光转身[N];吴忠日报;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 马丽;“执行难”原因及对策研究[D];中国政法大学;2004年
2 刘海威;论客观执行不能[D];山东大学;2007年
3 王博;消极执行的表现及对策研究[D];兰州大学;2011年
4 李娇;执行异议制度研究[D];中国政法大学;2011年
5 张锋学;民事判决“执行难”研究[D];华南师范大学;2005年
6 颜浩;“执行难”案件的类型化研究[D];吉林大学;2009年
7 黄家传;对执行难问题的法律思考[D];苏州大学;2002年
8 李跃;论我国执行救济制度的改革与完善[D];苏州大学;2006年
9 李强;民事“执行难”及其解决问题研究[D];华中科技大学;2010年
10 崔铎瀛;债务类案件司法执行难的原因及其对策探究[D];烟台大学;2013年
,本文编号:2387190
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2387190.html