论审查逮捕阶段非法证据排除规则

发布时间：2018-12-24 09:26

【摘要】：审查逮捕阶段作为检察机关处置案件的重要阶段一直深受业界关注。2010年出台的《两个证据规定》,明确赋予检察机关在批捕阶段非法证据的排除权能,2012年新修订的刑事诉讼法却未规定检察机关的此项权能。后又在《人民检察院刑诉法规则》中增入。新修订的刑事诉讼法对于证据非法的排除范畴、公诉以及审判阶段内排除非法证据的程序等均有明确规定,但至于具体实施方法、步骤,新规则均未予以详尽说明。显然规则的调整不但给法律理解造成一定困难,而且在实践方面也引起一些问题。检察机关倘若能够在审查逮捕阶段,就对证据进行审查,进行非法证据的排除工作,不仅有利于提升案件审查工作的质量,进一步保障犯罪嫌疑人应有权利,且对侦查机关的前期取证工作有积极引导作用,有助于确保前期取得证据的合法性,并为后续阶段奠定较好基础。目前学者更关注审判阶段非法证据的排除,并进行了大量研究,尚未对审查逮捕阶段非法证据排除予以重视,研究相对较少。本文拟自国内司法实践工作出发,分析审查逮捕阶段检察机关加强非法证据排除工作的可操作性,结合审查逮捕阶段有关的诉讼法理论和实践工作为基础,论述怎样在审查逮捕阶段的排除非法证据。本论文内容主要分成五个部分：引言、正文以及结语,正文共有五部分,具体内容如下：第一部分主要分析检察机关作为非法证据排除主体的依据；第二部分分析审查逮捕阶段是检察机关排除非法证据的最佳时机；第三部分分析适用方面存在的困难；第四部分分析具体实现路径；第五部分分析现实程序设计。
[Abstract]:As an important stage for procuratorial organs to deal with cases, the stage of examining and arresting has been deeply concerned by the industry. In 2010, the "two evidence provisions", which explicitly gave the procuratorial organs the power to exclude illegal evidence at the stage of approving arrest, The new Criminal procedure Code, as amended in 2012, does not provide for this power of prosecution. Later in the people's Procuratorate in the Criminal procedure Law rules. The newly revised Criminal procedure Law has clear provisions on the scope of illegal exclusion of evidence, public prosecution and the procedure of excluding illegal evidence in the trial stage, but as for the specific implementation methods and steps, the new rules have not been explained in detail. It is obvious that the adjustment of rules not only makes it difficult to understand the law, but also causes some problems in practice. If the procuratorial organ can examine the evidence and exclude illegal evidence at the stage of examination and arrest, it will not only help to improve the quality of the case review work, but also further safeguard the due rights of the criminal suspect. It can help to ensure the legitimacy of the evidence obtained in the early stage and lay a good foundation for the follow-up stage. At present, scholars pay more attention to the exclusion of illegal evidence in the trial stage, and have carried out a lot of research, but they have not paid much attention to the exclusion of illegal evidence at the stage of examination and arrest, and the research is relatively few. Starting from the domestic judicial practice, this paper analyzes the maneuverability of the procuratorial organs to strengthen the exclusion of illegal evidence in the stage of examination and arrest, and combines the theory and practice of the procedural law related to the examination of the arrest stage as the basis. Discuss how to exclude illegal evidence at the stage of examining arrest. The main content of this paper is divided into five parts: introduction, text and conclusion, there are five parts of the text, the specific content is as follows: the first part mainly analyzes the procuratorial organ as the basis of the exclusion of illegal evidence; The second part analyzes the arrest stage is the best time for procuratorial organs to exclude illegal evidence; the third part analyzes the difficulties in application; the fourth part analyzes the specific realization path; the fifth part analyzes the practical program design.
【学位授予单位】：云南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】